The shortest way: Kant's rewriting of the transcendental deduction

被引:0
作者
Bauer, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Rowan Univ, Dept Philosophy & Relig Studies, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2022年 / 65卷 / 05期
关键词
Kant; transcendental deduction; conceptualism; CATEGORIES; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/0020174X.2018.1533884
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This work examines Kant's remarkable decision to rewrite the core argument of the first Critique, the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. I identify a two-part structure common to both versions: first establishing an essential role for the categories in unifying sensible intuitions; and then addressing a worry about how the connection between our faculties asserted in the first part is possible. I employ this structure to show how Kant rewrote the argument, focusing on Kant's response to the concerns raised in an early review by Johann Schultz. Schultz's dissatisfaction with the original Deduction lies in its second part, and Kant's subsequent revisions are focused on providing a better answer to this how-possible question. The new Deduction offers a more direct and convincing account of how our faculties work together to make experience possible.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 545
页数:29
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Allais L., 2015, MANIFEST REALITY KAN
  • [2] Allison Henry E, 2004, KANTS TRANSCENDENTAL, VRevised and enlarged
  • [3] Allison HenryE., 2004, KANTS TRANSCENDENTAL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, NOTES FRAGMENTS
  • [5] Arnauld Antoine., 1996, Logic or the Art of Thinking, V5th, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139166768, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139166768]
  • [6] A Peculiar Intuition: Kant's Conceptualist Account of Perception
    Bauer, Nathan
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 55 (03): : 215 - 237
  • [7] Baumgarten HU, 1997, Z PHILOS FORSCH, V51, P411
  • [8] Beiser FrederickC., 1987, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674020696
  • [9] Conant J., 2004, Wittgenstein and Scepticism, P97
  • [10] Friedman Michael., 2002, THEORETICAL PHILOS 1