A STUDY ON MOTORCYCLISTS HEAD INJURIES IN CAR-MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS BASED ON REAL-WORLD DATA AND ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION

被引:10
作者
Xiao, Yingni [1 ]
Huang, Helai [1 ]
Peng, Yong [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wang, Xinghua [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Joint Int Res Lab Key Technol Rail Traff Safety, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Natl & Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Safety Technol Ra, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Motorcycle helmet; head injury prevention; epidemiological analysis; accident reconstruction; GROUND IMPACT; BRAIN-INJURY; HELMET USE; COLLISIONS; PROTECTION; MODEL; RISK; NECK;
D O I
10.1142/S0219519418500367
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Accident data had shown that as one of the most vulnerable road users, the risk of motorcyclist casualties due to head injuries is extremely high in motorcycle accidents. The objective of this study was to analyze motorcyclist head injury based on epidemiological statistical analysis and car-motorcycle accident reconstruction using real world accident data, and obtain a comprehensive understanding about safety effects of helmets on motorcyclists head injury. In epidemiological data analysis of this study, odds ratios (ORs) was applied to identify differences in injuries between helmeted and unhelmeted motorcyclists. Two vehicle-motorcycle collisions with detailed information were reconstructed by using PC-Crash simulation and MADYMO reconstruction. Furthermore, the head injury reconstruction using MADYMO outputs as boundary conditions was accomplished and analyzed with respect to 1st principal strain, Von Mises stress, coup pressure, countercoup pressure at the cerebrum. The results indicated that unhelmeted motorcyclists were more likely to suffer head injury, serious and fatal injury, and tend to take equal responsibility or more. 1st principal strain was reduced from 0.44 to 0.25 for Case 1, and from 0.16 to 0.10 for case 2 when including a helmet. Von Mises stress were reduced from 30.37 kpa to 19.51 kpa for Case 1 and from 3.42 kpa to 3.03 kpa for case when including a helmet, which meant a reduction of the risk of concussion. But the motorcyclist in Case 2 experienced a lower percentage increase in coup pressure and countercoup pressure. This study provided comprehensive knowledge on motorcyclists head injuries and the effectiveness of helmets as well as contributing to develop the injury prevention measures and protection devices of motorcyclists.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Gender differences of young drivers on injury severity outcome of highway crashes [J].
Amarasingha, Niranga ;
Dissanayake, Sunanda .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2014, 49 :113-120
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J SAFETY SCI TECHNOL
[3]   Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury [J].
Bain, AC ;
Meaney, DF .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (06) :615-622
[4]   FEA of helmet-head injury protection based on motorcycle accident reconstruction [J].
Chen, Jiguang ;
Yang, Jikuang ;
Zhou Xuenong ;
Chao, Zhang ;
Yu Xiaoping ;
Li Weiqiang ;
Wang Meichuan .
2013 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEASURING TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS AUTOMATION (ICMTMA 2013), 2013, :570-573
[5]   The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact [J].
Crocetta, Gianmarco ;
Piantini, Simone ;
Pierini, Marco ;
Simms, Ciaran .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 79 :56-69
[6]   The efficacy of bicycle helmets against brain injury [J].
Curnow, WJ .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2003, 35 (02) :287-292
[7]   The protective effect of a helmet in three bicycle accidents-A finite element study [J].
Fahlstedt, Madelen ;
Halldin, Peter ;
Kleiven, Svein .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 91 :135-143
[8]  
Fildes B, 2004, 2004 INT C BIOM IMP
[9]   Protection of the side of the head [J].
Gilchrist, A ;
Mills, NJ .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1996, 28 (04) :525-535