Assessing the Dual Innovation Capability of National Innovation System: Empirical Evidence from 65 Countries

被引:12
作者
Lu, Han [1 ,2 ]
Du, Debin [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Xionghe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Inst Global Innovat & Dev, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[3] East China Normal Univ, Ctr Innovat & Strateg Studies, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
关键词
dual innovation capability; process-oriented; open innovation; national innovation system; composite indicator; MEDIATING ROLE; TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES; KNOWLEDGE; PRODUCT; DETERMINANTS; EFFICIENCY; OPENNESS; PARADOX; CHINA; EXPLOITATION;
D O I
10.3390/systems10020023
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Open innovation has drawn significant attention over the years, and there is a growing body of literature that highlights the importance of considering this phenomenon at the national level. Less appreciated, however, is the radiative capability of national innovation systems (NIS) and the linking inbound and outbound processes. We provide a measurement of the dual innovation capability (DIC) of NISs based on process-oriented concepts by using a multi-indicator approach, which provides a more comprehensive picture of sectoral NISs compared to currently used metrics. To assess the DIC of NISs, a composite weighting method was used to obtain the score of our selection of 65 countries. The results show the spatio-temporal evolution of DIC from 2010 to 2018 and explore the interactions among sub-elements within the framework. The 65 countries were grouped into 4 categories based on the sub-dimension scores, and we provided 3 possible paths that can be chosen to improve DIC. The index provides a powerful tool to enrich research on innovation systems, guide national positioning, and optimize policies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 93 条
[21]   The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity [J].
Castellacci, Fulvio ;
Miguel Natera, Jose .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (03) :579-594
[22]   Closing the Technology Gap? [J].
Castellacci, Fulvio .
REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 15 (01) :180-197
[23]  
Cervantes M., 2018, OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook, P95, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2018-9-en, DOI 10.1787/STI_IN_OUTLOOK-2018-9-EN]
[24]   Staged efficiency and its determinants of regional innovation systems: a two-step analytical procedure [J].
Chen Kaihua ;
Kou Mingting .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, 52 (02) :627-657
[25]   Performance evaluation of China's high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain [J].
Chen, Xiafei ;
Liu, Zhiying ;
Zhu, Qingyuan .
TECHNOVATION, 2018, 74-75 :42-53
[26]   The Geography of Innovation in China and India [J].
Crescenzi, Riccardo ;
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 41 (06) :1010-1027
[27]   Globalization of innovation production: A patent-based industry analysis [J].
Danguy, Jerome .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 44 (01) :75-94
[28]   Developing a Systems Architecture Model to Study the Science, Technology and Innovation in International Studies [J].
Del Canto Viterale, Francisco .
SYSTEMS, 2019, 7 (03)
[29]  
Directorate-General for Internal Market Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs (European Commission), 2018, EUROPEAN INNOVATION, DOI [10.2873/447902, DOI 10.2873/447902]
[30]   The regulation of entry [J].
Djankov, S ;
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-De-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (01) :1-37