Differences in processing violations of sequential and feature regularities as revealed by visual event-related brain potentials

被引:14
作者
Bubic, Andreja [1 ]
Bendixen, Alexandra [2 ,3 ]
Schubotz, Ricarda I. [4 ]
Jacobsen, Thomas [2 ,5 ]
Schroeger, Erich [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Dept Cognit Neurol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol 1, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Max Planck Inst Neurol Res, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Fed Armed Forces Hamburg, Helmut Schmidt Univ, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Attention; Deviance detection; Event-related potentials (ERP); N2; P3b; Sequencing; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN; STIMULUS EVALUATION; PREMOTOR CORTEX; ATTENTION; MEMORY; P300; FMRI; ERP; SEQUENCES; DEVIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.072
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Identifying novel or unexpected events which violate predictions based on the regularities extracted from our environment is crucially important for adaptive behavior. However, the exact dynamics of processing such events is not well understood. Furthermore, it is not known in which degree the process of deviant detection differs across contexts and how much it depends on the characteristics of deviant events. This issue was addressed by the present study which used event-related potentials (ERPs) in order to investigate the dynamics of identifying two types of deviants presented within the same visual setting. These events violated expectations based on two different types of information contained within each trial, either temporal order of stimulus presentation (sequential deviant) or physical attributes shared by the majority of individual stimuli (feature deviant). The obtained results indicate a certain degree of similarity in detecting two deviant types which, when task-relevant, both elicited N2 and P3b event-related potential components. However, significant differences across different stages of their processing were also identified. First, only feature, but not sequential deviants elicited an N1 enhancement. Furthermore, N2 and P3b responses elicited by sequential and feature deviants differed in their latency and topography and, in case of P3b, amplitude. Taken together, these results suggest that the dynamics of detecting different types of deviants strongly depends on the specific characteristics of such events. Furthermore, the identified differences in the topography of N2 and P3b indicate distinct mechanisms underlying several stages of their processing. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 202
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   Instruction differentiates the processing of temporal and spatial sequential patterns: evidence from slow wave activity in humans [J].
Schubotz, R .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1999, 265 (01) :1-4
[52]   Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies [J].
Schubotz, RI ;
von Cramon, DY .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 :S120-S131
[53]   Dynamic patterns make the premotor cortex interested in objects: influence of stimulus and task revealed by fMRI [J].
Schubotz, RI ;
von Cramon, DY .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (03) :357-369
[54]  
SCHUBOTZ RI, 2008, SENSORIMOTOR FDN HIG, V22, P141
[55]   Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework [J].
Schubotz, Ricarda I. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (05) :211-218
[56]  
Soltani Maryam, 2000, Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, V14, P199
[57]   Brain mechanisms for detecting perceptual, semantic, and emotional deviance [J].
Strange, BA ;
Henson, RNA ;
Friston, KJ ;
Dolan, RJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (04) :425-433
[58]   EVOKED-POTENTIAL CORRELATES OF STIMULUS UNCERTAINTY [J].
SUTTON, S ;
BRAREN, M ;
ZUBIN, J ;
JOHN, ER .
SCIENCE, 1965, 150 (3700) :1187-&
[60]   P3b: Towards some decision about memory [J].
Verleger, Rolf .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (04) :968-970