The UK 9/11 evacuation study: Analysis of survivors' recognition and response phase in WTC1

被引:58
作者
McConnell, N. C. [1 ]
Boyce, K. E. [1 ]
Shields, J. [1 ]
Galea, E. R. [2 ]
Day, R. C. [2 ]
Hulse, L. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulster, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Univ Greenwich, FSEG, London SE10 9LS, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
World Trade Centre; Survivors; 9/11; Recognition phase; Response phase; Risk perception; Terrorism; Fire; Evacuation; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.09.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The September 11th 2001 impact on the World Trade Centre (WTC) resulted in one of the most significant evacuations of a high-rise building in modern times. The UK High-rise Evacuation Evaluation Database (HEED) study aimed to capture and collate the experiences and behaviours of WTC evacuees in a database, which would facilitate and encourage future research, which in turn would influence the design construction and use of safer built environments. A data elicitation tool designed for the purpose comprised a pre-interview questionnaire followed by a one-to-one interview protocol consisting of free-flow narratives and semi-structured interviews of WTC evacuees. This paper, which is one in a series dealing with issues relating to the successful evacuations of towers 1 and 2, focuses on cue recognition and response patterns within WTC1. Results are presented by vertical floor clusters and include information regarding cues experienced, activities prior and subsequent to occupants first becoming aware that something was wrong, perceived personal risk, time taken to respond and the interrelationships between them. The results indicate differences in occupant activities across the floor clusters and suggest that these differences can be explained in terms of the perception of risk and the nature and extent of cues received by the participants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 34
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, 45 BUILD US SAF RES
[2]  
AVERILL JD, 2005, 17 NIST NCSTAR FED B
[3]  
Brennan P., 1997, Fire Safety Science, V5, P807
[4]  
British Standards Institution (BSI), 2004, 797462004 BSI
[5]  
BRYAN JL, 1995, SFPE HDB FIRE PROTEC
[6]  
CANTER D, 1985, BR61 BUILD RES EST
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2004, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V53, P815
[8]   DEFINING RISK [J].
FISCHHOFF, B ;
WATSON, SR ;
HOPE, C .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1984, 17 (02) :123-139
[9]  
Galea ER, 2004, 62005 ODPM
[10]  
Galea ER., 2008, J APPL FIRE SCI, V15, P253