Differential co-expression-based detection of conditional relationships in transcriptional data: comparative analysis and application to breast cancer

被引:48
作者
Bhuva, Dharmesh D. [1 ,2 ]
Cursons, Joseph [1 ,3 ]
Smyth, Gordon K. [1 ,2 ]
Davis, Melissa J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Walter & Eliza Hall Inst Med Res, Bioinformat Div, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Math & Stat, Fac Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med Biol, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Clin Pathol, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Gene regulation; Differential co-expression; Differential networks; Systems modelling; Immune infiltration; Breast cancer; 3-WAY GENE INTERACTIONS; STATISTICAL-METHODS; COEXPRESSED GENES; IDENTIFICATION; ANIMALTFDB; STRATEGIES; PREDICTION; INFERENCE; PACKAGE; STATES;
D O I
10.1186/s13059-019-1851-8
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BackgroundElucidation of regulatory networks, including identification of regulatory mechanisms specific to a given biological context, is a key aim in systems biology. This has motivated the move from co-expression to differential co-expression analysis and numerous methods have been developed subsequently to address this task; however, evaluation of methods and interpretation of the resulting networks has been hindered by the lack of known context-specific regulatory interactions.ResultsIn this study, we develop a simulator based on dynamical systems modelling capable of simulating differential co-expression patterns. With the simulator and an evaluation framework, we benchmark and characterise the performance of inference methods. Defining three different levels of "true" networks for each simulation, we show that accurate inference of causation is difficult for all methods, compared to inference of associations. We show that a z-score-based method has the best general performance. Further, analysis of simulation parameters reveals five network and simulation properties that explained the performance of methods. The evaluation framework and inference methods used in this study are available in the dcanr R/Bioconductor package.ConclusionsOur analysis of networks inferred from simulated data show that hub nodes are more likely to be differentially regulated targets than transcription factors. Based on this observation, we propose an interpretation of the inferred differential network that can reconstruct a putative causal network.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Amar D, DICER DIFFERENTIAL C
[2]   Dissection of Regulatory Networks that Are Altered in Disease via Differential Co-expression [J].
Amar, David ;
Safer, Hershel ;
Shamir, Ron .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 9 (03)
[3]   Loss of Connectivity in Cancer Co-Expression Networks [J].
Anglani, Roberto ;
Creanza, Teresa M. ;
Liuzzi, Vania C. ;
Piepoli, Ada ;
Panza, Anna ;
Andriulli, Angelo ;
Ancona, Nicola .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)
[4]   Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview [J].
Baldi, P ;
Brunak, S ;
Chauvin, Y ;
Andersen, CAF ;
Nielsen, H .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (05) :412-424
[5]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[6]  
Bhuva DD, GENE REGULATORY NETW
[7]  
Bhuva DD, 812 SIMULATED EXPRES
[8]  
Bhuva Dharmesh D, 2019, F1000Res, V8, P776, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.19236.3
[9]   New network topology approaches reveal differential correlation patterns in breast cancer [J].
Bockmayr, Michael ;
Klauschen, Frederick ;
Gyoerffy, Balazs ;
Denkert, Carsten ;
Budczies, Jan .
BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2013, 7
[10]   Identifying set-wise differential co-expression in gene expression microarray data [J].
Cho, Sung Bum ;
Kim, Jihun ;
Kim, Ju Han .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10