Wind Energy Development Site Selection Using an Integrated Fuzzy ANP-TOPSIS Decision Model

被引:24
作者
Shafiee, Mahmood [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Sch Engn, Mech Engn Grp, Canterbury CT2 7NT, Kent, England
关键词
wind energy; site selection; uncertainty; multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); analytic network process (ANP); technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); HYBRID MCDM APPROACH; OFFSHORE WIND; MULTICRITERIA SELECTION; ENVIRONMENT; LOCATION; STRATEGY; FARMS;
D O I
10.3390/en15124289
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The identification of appropriate locations for wind energy development is a complex problem that involves several factors, ranging from technical to socio-economic and environmental aspects. Wind energy site selection is generally associated with high degrees of uncertainty due to the long planning, design, construction, and operational timescales. Thus, there is a crucial need to develop efficient methods that are capable of capturing uncertainties in subjective assessments provided by different stakeholders with diverse views. This paper proposes a novel multi-criteria decision model integrating the fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) and the fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to evaluate and prioritize the potential sites for wind power development. Four major criteria, namely economic, social, technical, and geographical, with nine sub-criteria are identified based on consultation with wind farm investors, regulatory bodies, landowners and residents, developers and operators, component suppliers, ecologists, and GIS analysts. The stakeholders' preferences regarding the relative importance of criteria are measured using a logarithmic least squares method, and then the alternative sites are prioritized based on their relative closeness to the positive ideal solution. The proposed model is applied to determine the most appropriate site for constructing an onshore wind power plant consisting of 10 wind turbines of 2.5 MW. Finally, the results are discussed and compared with those obtained using the traditional AHP, ANP and ANP-TOPSIS decision-making approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Technology Selection [J].
Aliakbari Nouri, Fahimeh ;
Khalili Esbouei, Saber ;
Antucheviciene, Jurgita .
INFORMATICA, 2015, 26 (03) :369-388
[2]   Integrity Assessment of Medical Devices for Improving Hospital Services [J].
Alzahrani, Fahad A. ;
Ahmad, Masood ;
Nadeem, Mohd ;
Kumar, Rajeev ;
Khan, Raees Ahmad .
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 67 (03) :3619-3633
[3]   Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process [J].
Aras, H ;
Erdogmus, S ;
Koç, E .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2004, 29 (08) :1383-1392
[4]  
Asadi M., 2017, Comput. Water Energy Environ. Eng., V06, P41, DOI [10.4236/cweee.2017.61004, DOI 10.4236/CWEEE.2017.61004]
[5]   Land suitability assessment for wind power plant site selection using ANP-DEMATEL in a GIS environment: case study of Ardabil province, Iran [J].
Azizi, Ali ;
Malekmohammadi, Bahram ;
Jafari, Hamid Reza ;
Nasiri, Hossein ;
Parsa, Vahid Amini .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2014, 186 (10) :6695-6709
[6]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[7]   Offshore wind power plant site selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process for Northwest Turkey [J].
Caceoglu, Eray ;
Yildiz, Hatice Kubra ;
Oguz, Elif ;
Huvaj, Nejan ;
Guerrero, Josep M. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 252
[8]   A method of fuzzy preference relation to authorize the worldwide interoperability for microwave access license in Taiwan [J].
Chang, Tsung-Han .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (08) :3856-3869
[9]   Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States [J].
Chaouachi, Aymen ;
Covrig, Catalin Felix ;
Ardelean, Mircea .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 103 :179-192
[10]  
Chatterjee NC., 2012, Decision Science Letters, V2, P1, DOI [10.5267/j.dsl.2012.11.001, DOI 10.5267/J.DSL.2012.11.001]