Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: The transradial route is successful and safe

被引:59
作者
Hildick-Smith, DJR [1 ]
Walsh, JT [1 ]
Lowe, MD [1 ]
Petch, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Papworth Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Cambridge CB3 8RE, England
关键词
transradial; coronary; complications; anticoagulation;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.10374
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The radial approach to coronary angiography is intuitively attractive for fully anticoagulated patients (INR > 2) but no data exist concerning efficacy or safety of this procedure. The consensus view is that the femoral approach is contraindicated in fully anticoagulated patients, and though some operators undertake femoral catheterization in such patients and use closure devices, there are no data to suggest that it is safe to do so. At our institution, the radial approach for coronary angiography is reserved for patients in whom there is a relative contraindication to the femoral route. We have undertaken over 600 radial coronary angiograms in such patients since 1996, 66 of whom underwent transradial catheterization specifically because of anticoagulation status (INR > 2). Thirty-eight patients (58%) were male, average age 67 +/- 11 years. All 66 patients had an INR > 2 but < 4.5. The approach was left radial in 26 (39%), right radial in the remainder; sheath size was 4 Fr in 4 (6%), 5 Fr in 13 (20%), and 6 Fr in 49 (74%). Seven operators in total were involved, though two operators undertook the majority of cases (47; 71%). Success rate was 97%, with no failure of access, and only one minor postprocedural hemorrhage. Failures were due to radial artery atherosclerosis (1) and subclavian tortuosity (1). The radial approach to coronary angiography is safe and to be recommended in the fully anticoagulated patient.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 10
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] INCIDENCE AND RESULTS OF ARTERIAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG 16,350 PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION
    BABU, SC
    PICCORELLI, GO
    SHAH, PM
    STEIN, JH
    CLAUSS, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1989, 10 (02) : 113 - 116
  • [2] Clark DA, 1996, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V39, P371, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199612)39:4<371::AID-CCD9>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-A
  • [4] COMPLICATIONS OF CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY FROM THE COLLABORATIVE STUDY OF CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY (CASS)
    DAVIS, K
    KENNEDY, JW
    KEMP, HG
    JUDKINS, MP
    GOSSELIN, AJ
    KILLIP, T
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1979, 59 (06) : 1105 - 1112
  • [5] VASCULAR INJURY FOLLOWING CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION, CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY, AND CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY
    FRANSSON, SG
    NYLANDER, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1994, 15 (02) : 232 - 235
  • [6] Transbrachial arteriography: Indications and complications
    Heenan, SD
    Grubnic, S
    Buckenham, TM
    Belli, AM
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 51 (03) : 205 - 209
  • [7] Comparison of radial versus brachial approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography when the femoral approach is contraindicated
    Hildick-Smith, DJR
    Ludman, PF
    Lowe, MD
    Stephens, NG
    Harcombe, AA
    Walsh, JT
    Stone, DL
    Shapiro, LM
    Schofield, PM
    Petch, MC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (06) : 770 - 772
  • [8] Coronary angiography from the radial artery - experience, complications and limitations
    Hildick-Smith, DJR
    Lowe, MD
    Walsh, JT
    Ludman, PF
    Stephens, NG
    Schofield, PM
    Stone, DL
    Shapiro, LM
    Petch, MC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 64 (03) : 231 - 239
  • [9] Hildick-Smith DJR, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V49, P32, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200001)49:1<32::AID-CCD6>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-#