Towards a guideline for evaluation metrics in medical image segmentation

被引:240
作者
Mueller, Dominik [1 ,2 ]
Soto-Rey, Inaki [2 ]
Kramer, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Augsburg, IT Infrastruct Translat Med Res, Augsburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Augsburg, Inst Digital Med, Med Data Integrat Ctr, Augsburg, Germany
关键词
Biomedical image segmentation; Semantic segmentation; Medical Image Analysis; Reproducibility; Evaluation; Guideline; Performance assessment;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-022-06096-y
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the last decade, research on artificial intelligence has seen rapid growth with deep learning models, especially in the field of medical image segmentation. Various studies demonstrated that these models have powerful prediction capabilities and achieved similar results as clinicians. However, recent studies revealed that the evaluation in image segmentation studies lacks reliable model performance assessment and showed statistical bias by incorrect metric implementation or usage. Thus, this work provides an overview and interpretation guide on the following metrics for medical image segmentation evaluation in binary as well as multi-class problems: Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard, Sensitivity, Specificity, Rand index, ROC curves, Cohen's Kappa, and Hausdorff distance. Furthermore, common issues like class imbalance and statistical as well as interpretation biases in evaluation are discussed. As a summary, we propose a guideline for standardized medical image segmentation evaluation to improve evaluation quality, reproducibility, and comparability in the research field.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abraham N, 2019, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P683, DOI 10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759329
[2]   Dataset of breast ultrasound images [J].
Al-Dhabyani, Walid ;
Gomaa, Mohammed ;
Khaled, Hussien ;
Fahmy, Aly .
DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 28
[3]   Going Deep in Medical Image Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions [J].
Altaf, Fouzia ;
Islam, Syed M. S. ;
Akhtar, Naveed ;
Janjua, Naeem Khalid .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :99540-99572
[4]  
[Anonymous], COH KAPP WHAT IT IS
[5]  
[Anonymous], about us
[6]   Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: a review [J].
Asgari Taghanaki, Saeid ;
Abhishek, Kumar ;
Cohen, Joseph Paul ;
Cohen-Adad, Julien ;
Hamarneh, Ghassan .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (01) :137-178
[7]   On the usage of average Hausdorff distance for segmentation performance assessment: hidden error when used for ranking [J].
Aydin, Orhun Utku ;
Taha, Abdel Aziz ;
Hilbert, Adam ;
Khalil, Ahmed A. ;
Galinovic, Ivana ;
Fiebach, Jochen B. ;
Frey, Dietmar ;
Madai, Vince Istvan .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2021, 5 (01)
[8]   WM-DOVA maps for accurate polyp highlighting in colonoscopy: Validation vs. saliency maps from physicians [J].
Bernal, Jorge ;
Javier Sanchez, F. ;
Fernandez-Esparrach, Gloria ;
Gil, Debora ;
Rodriguez, Cristina ;
Vilarino, Fernando .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2015, 43 :99-111
[9]   Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: the 2018 Data Science Bowl [J].
Caicedo, Juan C. ;
Goodman, Allen ;
Karhohs, Kyle W. ;
Cimini, Beth A. ;
Ackerman, Jeanelle ;
Haghighi, Marzieh ;
Heng, CherKeng ;
Becker, Tim ;
Minh Doan ;
McQuin, Claire ;
Rohban, Mohammad ;
Singh, Shantanu ;
Carpenter, Anne E. .
NATURE METHODS, 2019, 16 (12) :1247-+
[10]   Potentials of AI in medical image analysis in Gastroenterology and Hepatology [J].
Chen, Hao ;
Sung, Joseph J. Y. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01) :31-38