Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines against SARS-Cov-2

被引:13
作者
Baldo, Aline [1 ]
Leunda, Amaya [1 ]
Willemarck, Nicolas [1 ]
Pauwels, Katia [1 ]
机构
[1] Sciensano, Serv Biosafety & Biotechnol, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstr 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; recombinant viral vector vaccines; environmental risk assessment; vaccination; biosafety; VESICULAR STOMATITIS-VIRUS; T-CELL RESPONSES; MEASLES-VIRUS; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; GENE-THERAPY; ADENOVIRUS VECTORS; CHROMOSOMAL INTEGRATION; NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY; CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT; INFLUENZA VACCINE;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines9050453
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Over the past months, considerable efforts have been put into developing effective and safe drugs and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Various platforms are being used for the development of COVID-19 vaccine candidates: recombinant viral vectors, protein-based vaccines, nucleic acid-based vaccines, and inactivated/attenuated virus. Recombinant viral vector vaccine candidates represent a significant part of those vaccine candidates in clinical development, with two already authorised for use in the European Union and one currently under rolling review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Since recombinant viral vector vaccine candidates are considered as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their regulatory oversight includes besides an assessment of their quality, safety and efficacy, also an environmental risk assessment (ERA). The present article highlights the main characteristics of recombinant viral vector vaccine (candidates) against SARS-CoV-2 in the pipeline and discusses their features from an environmental risk point of view.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, OFF J, VL200
[2]  
[Anonymous], UW MADISON FLUGEN BH
[3]  
[Anonymous], MERCK STOPS DEV BOTH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, OFF J, VL121, P34
[5]  
[Anonymous], COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V106, P1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, OFF J, VL136, P1
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, **NON-TRADITIONAL**, VL 231
[9]  
[Atkinson W. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], 2009, Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, V11
[10]   A Phase 3 Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Ceftobiprole Medocaril Versus Ceftazidime Plus Linezolid for the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia [J].
Awad, Samir S. ;
Rodriguez, Alejandro H. ;
Chuang, Yin-Ching ;
Marjanek, Zsuszanna ;
Pareigis, Alex J. ;
Reis, Gilmar ;
Scheeren, Thomas W. L. ;
Sanchez, Alejandro S. ;
Zhou, Xin ;
Saulay, Mikal ;
Engelhardt, Marc .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 59 (01) :51-61