Removal sulfate and metals Fe+2, Cu+2, and Zn+2 from acid mine drainage in an anaerobic sequential batch reactor

被引:57
作者
Costa, Josiel Martins [1 ]
Rodriguez, Renata Piacentini [1 ]
Sancinetti, Giselle Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Alfenas UNIFAL MG, Inst Sci & Technol, Lab Anaerob Biotechnol, Rodovia Jose Aurelio Vilela 11999,BR 267,Km 533, BR-37715400 Pocos De Caldas, MG, Brazil
关键词
Acid mine drainage; Metal precipitation; ASBR; Sulfate removal; REDUCING BACTERIA; WASTE-WATER; BIOREACTORS; REDUCTION; RECOVERY; TIME; AMD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2017.04.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Acid mine drainage (AMD) features a significant environmental problem due the production of acidic solution generated by the oxidation of mining waste. Accordingly, there is constant necessity for treatment technologies and processes to make likely residue to be launched of aquatic system without changing water quality. The use of anaerobic sequential batch reactor (ASBR) for AMD treatment has shown to be a viable alternative, as sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) reduce sulfate ions to sulfide that may precipitate metals presents in solution or oxidize sulfide produced to elemental sulfur. An ASBR with 7 L was operated at 30 degrees C for the treatment of synthetic AMD containing SO4 2-1500 mg/L, with ratio COD/Sulfate equal 1 and ethanol as carbon source for 270 days with 6 phases containing different concentrations of metals (100-400 mg L-1 of Fe2+, 20-40 mg L-1 of Zn2+, 5-10 mg L-1 of Cu2+), based on values with potential toxicity to SRB. During the operation phases the concentration of metals gave an increase in removal SO42-. COD removal ranged from 68.4 to 94.4% and sulfate from 39.1 to 72.8%. The Fe2+ removals were above 99.2%, Zn2+-100% and Cu2+ above 93.3%. Given the high removal metals and SO42-, ASBR characterized a form suitable for the AMD treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1985 / 1989
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies [J].
Akcil, Ata ;
Koldas, Soner .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (12-13) :1139-1145
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ANALES HIDROLOG A M
[3]   INITIAL STUDIES ON THE ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR [J].
DAGUE, RR ;
HABBEN, CE ;
PIDAPARTI, SR .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 26 (9-11) :2429-2432
[4]  
Hao O.J., 2000, Environmental technologies to treat sulfur pollution: principles and engineering, P393
[5]   Application of molecular techniques to evaluate the methanogenic archaea and anaerobic bacteria in the presence of oxygen with different COD:sulfate ratios in a UASB reactor [J].
Hirasawa, Julia Sumiko ;
Sarti, Arnaldo ;
Saavedra Del Aguila, Nora Katia ;
Varesche, Maria Bernadete A. .
ANAEROBE, 2008, 14 (04) :209-218
[6]   Utilisation of residue gas sludge (BOS sludge) for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage (AMD) [J].
Jafaripour, A. ;
Rowson, N. A. ;
Ghataora, G. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2015, 144 :90-96
[7]   Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review [J].
Johnson, DB ;
Hallberg, KB .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 338 (1-2) :3-14
[8]   Sulfate reduction based bioprocesses for the treatment of acid mine drainage and the recovery of metals [J].
Kaksonen, A. H. ;
Puhakka, J. A. .
ENGINEERING IN LIFE SCIENCES, 2007, 7 (06) :541-564
[9]   Heavy metal removal from multicomponent system by sulfate reducing bacteria: Mechanism and cell surface characterization [J].
Kiran, M. Gopi ;
Pakshirajan, Kannan ;
Das, Gopal .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2017, 324 :62-70
[10]  
Madigan M.T., 2002, BROCK BIOL MICROORGA