Aerial insectivorous bat activity in relation to moonlight intensity

被引:58
作者
Appel, Giulliana [1 ]
Lopez-Baucells, Adria [2 ,3 ]
Magnusson, William Ernest [4 ]
Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Programa Posgrad Ecol, Av Andre Araujo 2936, CP 2223, BR-69080971 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
[2] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Ecol Evolut & Environm Changes, Fac Sci, Edificio C2,5 Piso, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Granollers Museum Nat Sci, Bat Res Grp, C Palaudaries 102, Granollers 08402, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Inst Nacl de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Coordenacao Biodiversidade, Av Andre Araujo 2936,CP 2223, BR-69080971 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
关键词
Foraging strategy; Chiroptera; Moon; Rainforest; Hourly activity; ACTIVITY PATTERNS; LIGHT-INTENSITY; NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY; TEMPORAL PATTERNS; EMBALLONURID BATS; PHYLLOSTOMID BATS; MORMOOPID BATS; PREDATION RISK; EMERGENCE TIME; CHIROPTERA;
D O I
10.1016/j.mambio.2016.11.005
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
It is commonly assumed that aerial insectivorous bats in the tropics respond to moonlight intensity by decreasing their foraging activity during bright nights due either to an increase in predation risk, or to a reduction in insect availability. The effect of moonlight on bat activity can be measured both between nights and within a single night. However, few studies have simultaneously used both approaches, and most authors generally compare bat activity with lunar phases. Our main aim was to evaluate how moonlight influences aerial insectivorous bat activity at different time scales: between nights and within the same night. Activity of five bat species was measured using autonomous ultrasound recording stations and moonlight intensity percentages retrieved from the Moontool program nightly throughout a 53-day sampling period. Only one species (Myotis riparius) responded negatively to moonlight, while two species (Pteronotus pamellii and Saccopteryx leptura) increased their foraging activity in moonlight. For Cormura brevirostris and S. bilineata, moonlight intensity did not affect activity level. Bat activity was greater for all species at the beginning of the night, independent of the presence of the moon, indicating that foraging just after the sunset is adaptive. Thus, bat response to the effect of moonlight intensity is more apparent between nights than within a single night and may depend on species-specific traits, such as flight speed, flexibility in habitat use and body size. (C) 2016 Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Saugetierkunde. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   How high is high? Using percentile thresholds to identify peak bat activity [J].
Adams, Amanda M. ;
McGuire, Liam P. ;
Hooton, Lauren A. ;
Fenton, M. Brock .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2015, 93 (04) :307-313
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, BIOTA NEOTROP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CHIROPTERA NEOTROPIC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CHIROPTERA NEOTROPIC
[6]   Is part-night lighting an effective measure to limit the impacts of artificial lighting on bats? [J].
Azam, Clementine ;
Kerbiriou, Christian ;
Vernet, Arthur ;
Julien, Jean-Francois ;
Bas, Yves ;
Plichard, Laura ;
Maratrat, Julie ;
Le Viol, Isabelle .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (12) :4333-4341
[7]  
Barataud Michel, 2013, Rhinolophe, V19, P103
[9]  
Bates D., 2016, LINEAR MIXED EFFECTS
[10]   Bat mobility and roosts in a fragmented landscape in central Amazonia, Brazil [J].
Bernard, E ;
Fenton, MB .
BIOTROPICA, 2003, 35 (02) :262-277