Land Use/Land Cover Change Induced Impacts on Water Supply Service in the Upper Reach of Heihe River Basin

被引:53
作者
Geng, Xiaoli [1 ]
Wang, Xinsheng [1 ]
Yan, Haiming [2 ]
Zhang, Qian [3 ]
Jin, Gui [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ, Fac Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Chinese Agr Policy, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LUCC; water supply service; water yield; InVEST model; upper reach of Heihe River Basin; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; LUCC;
D O I
10.3390/su7010366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Heihe River Basin is the second largest inland river basin in China, where water supply service in the upper reach has greater influence on the sustainable development of middle and lower reaches. This study analyzed the influence of land use/land cover change (LUCC) on the water supply service in the upper reach by carrying out scenario simulation. Firstly, we analyzed the LUCC and climate change in the upper reach during 1990-2005; then the water supply service, which was represented by the annual water yield, was estimated with the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model. Thereafter three scenarios (precipitation change and LUCC change combined, LUCC change only, and precipitation change only) were established to analyze the impacts of LUCC and precipitation change on the water yield. The results show that the LUCC exerted great influence on water yield, while the impact of precipitation change is even more significant than that of LUCC. Although there are still some uncertainties, the results of this study can still provide valuable reference information for ecological conservation and water resource management in the upper reach of the Heihe River Basin.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 383
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Allen R.G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ACTA ECOL SIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, REMOTE SENS-BASEL
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1971, CLIMATE LIFE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ECOL APPL, DOI DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E40-E50
[9]   Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Harwood, Amii R. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Watson, Robert T. ;
Abson, David J. ;
Andrews, Barnaby ;
Binner, Amy ;
Crowe, Andrew ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Dugdale, Steve ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Foden, Jo ;
Hadley, David ;
Haines-Young, Roy ;
Hulme, Mark ;
Kontoleon, Andreas ;
Lovett, Andrew A. ;
Munday, Paul ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Paterson, James ;
Perino, Grischa ;
Sen, Antara ;
Siriwardena, Gavin ;
van Soest, Daan ;
Termansen, Mette .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) :45-50
[10]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404