Effectiveness of anchorage with temporary anchorage devices during anterior maxillary tooth retraction: A randomized clinical trial

被引:14
作者
Barthelemi, Stephane [1 ]
Desoutter, Alban [1 ]
Souare, Fatoumata [1 ]
Cuisinier, Frederic [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Dept Orthodont, 545 Ave Prof JL Viala, F-34193 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
Anchorage; Randomized clinical trial; Temporary anchorage devices; En masse retraction; EN-MASSE RETRACTION; MINI-IMPLANTS; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE; REINFORCEMENT; MOVEMENT; TEETH; RATES;
D O I
10.4041/kjod.2019.49.5.279
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study evaluated the efficiency of anchorage provided by temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in maxillary bicuspid extraction cases during retraction of the anterior teeth using a fixed appliance. Methods: Patients aged 12 to 50 years with malocclusion for which bilateral first or second maxillary bicuspid extractions were indicated were included in the study and randomly allocated to the TAD or control groups. Retraction of the anterior teeth was achieved using skeletal anchorage in the TAD group and conventional dental anchorage in the control group. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed after alignment of teeth, and a second CT scan was performed at the end of extraction space closure in both groups. A three-dimensional superimposition was performed to visualize and quantify the maxillary first molar movement during the retraction phase, which was the primary outcome, and the stability of TAD movement, which served as the secondary outcome. Results: Thirty-four patients (17 in each group) underwent the final analysis. The two groups showed a significant difference in the movement of the first maxillary molars, with less significant anchorage loss in the TAD group than that in the control group. In addition, TAD movement showed only a slight mesial movement on the labial side. On the palatal side, the mesial TAD movement was greater. Conclusions: In comparison with conventional dental anchorage, TADs can be considered an efficient source of anchorage during retraction of maxillary anterior teeth. TADs remain stable when correctly placed in the bone during the anterior tooth retraction phase.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 285
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Al-Sibaie, Salma ;
Hajeer, Mohammad Y. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (03) :275-283
[2]   Anchorage effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrews compared to headgear and transpalatal arches: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Alharbi, Fahad ;
Almuzian, Mohammed ;
Bearn, David .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 77 (02) :88-98
[3]   Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: A prospective clinical trial [J].
Aly, Shehab A. ;
Alyan, Doha ;
Fayed, Mona S. ;
Alhammadi, Maged S. ;
Mostafa, Yehya A. .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (03) :e12331
[4]   Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Antoszewska-Smith, Joanna ;
Sarul, Michal ;
Lyczek, Jan ;
Konopka, Tomasz ;
Kawala, Beata .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (03) :440-455
[5]   Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Becker, Kathrin ;
Pliska, Annika ;
Busch, Caroline ;
Wilmes, Benedict ;
Wolf, Michael ;
Drescher, Dieter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 4
[6]   Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage - a randomized clinical trial: Cephalometric results [J].
Benson, Philip E. ;
Tinsley, David ;
O'Dwyer, Jonathan J. ;
Majumdar, Arun ;
Doyle, Peter ;
Sandler, P. Jonathan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 132 (05) :606-615
[7]   Load-related bone modelling at the interface of orthodontic micro-implants [J].
Buechter, Andre ;
Wiechmann, Dirk ;
Gaertner, Christoph ;
Hendrik, Marc ;
Vogeler, Martin ;
Wiesmann, Hans Peter ;
Piffko, Josef ;
Meyer, Ulrich .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (06) :714-722
[8]   Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n > 50) [J].
Dalessandri, Domenico ;
Salgarello, Stefano ;
Dalessandri, Michela ;
Lazzaroni, Elena ;
Piancino, Mariagrazia ;
Paganelli, Corrado ;
Maiorana, Carlo ;
Santoro, Franco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (03) :303-313
[9]   Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Feldmann, Ingalill ;
Bondemark, Lars .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (03) :339.e19-339.e28
[10]   A STUDY OF ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE POSSIBILITIES IN BASAL BONE [J].
GAINSFORTH, BL ;
HIGLEY, LB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND ORAL SURGERY-ORTHODONTICS, 1945, 31 (08) :406-417