Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer

被引:3
作者
Chen, Zhen-Zhou [1 ]
Li, Yi-Dan [2 ]
Huang, Wang [1 ]
Chai, Ning-Hui [1 ]
Wei, Zheng-Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 1 Youyi Rd, Chongqing 400000, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing 400000, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY | 2021年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Low rectal cancer; Colonic pouch; Rectal resection syndrome; Low anterior rectal resection; Bowel function; Surgery; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; MESORECTAL EXCISION; RESERVOIR; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.303
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND With advancements in laparoscopic technology and the wide application of linear staplers, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed for low rectal cancer. However, sphincter-saving procedures have led to the emergence of a unique clinical disorder termed anterior rectal resection syndrome. Colonic pouch anastomosis improves the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer > 7 cm from the anal margin. But whether colonic pouch anastomosis can reduce the incidence of rectal resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer is unknown. AIM To compare postoperative and oncological outcomes and bowel function of straight and colonic pouch anal anastomoses after resection of low rectal cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 72 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-saving procedures with either straight or colonic pouch anastomoses. Functional evaluations were completed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively. We also compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups that had undergone low or ultralow anterior rectal resection. RESULTS There were no significant differences in mean operating time, blood loss, time to first passage of flatus and excrement, and duration of hospital stay between the colonic pouch and straight anastomosis groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage following colonic pouch construction was lower (11.4% vs 16.2%) but not significantly different than that of straight anastomosis. Patients with colonic pouch construction had lower postoperative low anterior resection syndrome scores than the straight anastomosis group, suggesting better bowel function (preoperative: 4.71 vs 3.89, P = 0.43; 1 mo after surgery: 34.2 vs 34.7, P = 0.59; 6 mo after surgery: 22.70 vs 29.0, P < 0.05; 12 mo after surgery: 15.5 vs 19.5, P = 0.01). The overall recurrence and metastasis rates were similar (4.3% and 11.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Colonic pouch anastomosis is a safe and effective procedure for colorectal reconstruction after low and ultralow rectal resections. Moreover, colonic pouch construction may provide better functional outcomes compared to straight anastomosis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis [J].
Alavi, Mubarika ;
Wendel, Christopher S. ;
Krouse, Robert S. ;
Temple, Larissa ;
Hornbrook, Mark C. ;
Bulkley, Joanna E. ;
McMullen, Carmit K. ;
Grant, Marcia ;
Herrinton, Lisa J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) :3596-3603
[2]   Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study [J].
Bregendahl, S. ;
Emmertsen, K. J. ;
Lous, J. ;
Laurberg, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (09) :1130-1139
[3]   Incidence and characterization of the anterior resection syndrome through the use of the LARS scale (low anterior resection score) [J].
Carrillo, Alberto ;
Maria Enriquez-Navascues, Jose ;
Rodriguez, Araceli ;
Placer, Carlos ;
Antonio Mugica, Jose ;
Saralegui, Yolanda ;
Timoteo, Ander ;
Borda, Nerea .
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2016, 94 (03) :137-143
[4]   A meta-analysis of the prevalence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and systematic review of risk factors [J].
Croese, Alexander D. ;
Lonie, James M. ;
Trollope, Alexandra F. ;
Vangaveti, Venkat N. ;
Ho, Yik-Hong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 56 :234-241
[5]   Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma - Comparison between the straight and colonic J pouch reconstruction [J].
Hallbook, O ;
Johansson, K ;
Sjodahl, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :389-392
[6]   Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection [J].
Hallbook, O ;
Pahlman, L ;
Krog, M ;
Wexner, SD ;
Sjodahl, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (01) :58-65
[7]   Reasons for failure to construct the colonic U-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir should it occur? [J].
Harris, GJC ;
Lavery, IJ ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (10) :1304-1308
[8]   Factors associated with low anterior resection syndrome after surgical treatment of rectal cancer [J].
Jimenez-Gomez, L. M. ;
Espin-Basany, E. ;
Trenti, L. ;
Marti-Gallostra, M. ;
Sanchez-Garcia, J. L. ;
Vallribera-Valls, F. ;
Kreisler, E. ;
Biondo, S. ;
Armengol-Carrasco, M. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (03) :195-200
[9]   Normative Data for the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS Score) [J].
Juul, Therese ;
Elfeki, Hossam ;
Christensen, Peter ;
Laurberg, Soren ;
Emmertsen, Katrine J. ;
Bager, Palle .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (06) :1124-1128
[10]  
Juul T, 2014, DIS COLON RECTUM, V57, P585, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000116