Testing Categorical Moderators in Mixed-Effects Meta-analysis in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity

被引:49
作者
Rubio-Aparicio, Maria [1 ]
Antonio Lopez-Lopez, Jose [2 ]
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang [3 ]
Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio [4 ]
Botella, Juan [5 ]
Sanchez-Meca, Julio [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Alicante, Spain
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Murcia, Murcia, Spain
[5] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Meta-analysis; mixed-effects model; subgroup analyses; residual between-studies variance; EFFECTS META-REGRESSION; VARIANCE ESTIMATORS; HETEROGENEITY; ANOVA;
D O I
10.1080/00220973.2018.1561404
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Mixed-effects models can be used to examine the association between a categorical moderator and the magnitude of the effect size. Two approaches are available to estimate the residual between-studies variance, -namely, separate estimation within each category of the moderator versus pooled estimation across all categories. We examine, by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, both approaches for estimation in combination with two methods, the Wald-type and F tests, to test the statistical significance of the moderator. Results suggest that the F test using a pooled estimate of across categories is the best option in most conditions, although the F test using separate estimates of is preferable if the residual heterogeneity variances are heteroscedastic.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 310
页数:23
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A Review of Meta-Analyses in Education: Methodological Strengths and Weaknesses [J].
Ahn, Soyeon ;
Ames, Allison J. ;
Myers, Nicholas D. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 82 (04) :436-476
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPREHENSIVE METAAN
[3]   Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed-effects meta-regression: A simulation study [J].
Antonio Lopez-Lopez, Jose ;
Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio ;
Sanchez-Meca, Julio ;
Van den Noortgate, Wim ;
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (01) :30-48
[4]  
Borenstein M., 2021, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences., V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-5439-0_2, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587, 10.4324/9780203771587]
[6]  
Cooper H., 2009, The hand- book of research synthesis and meta analysis, DOI DOI 10.7758/9781610448864
[7]   Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis [J].
Davey, Jonathan ;
Turner, Rebecca M. ;
Clarke, Mike J. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Advancing Theory by Assessing Boundary Conditions With Metaregression: A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations [J].
Gonzalez-Mule, Erik ;
Aguinis, Herman .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 44 (06) :2246-2273
[10]   Meta-regression in Stata [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (04) :493-519