Antenatal corticosteroids in preterm small-for-gestational age infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:30
作者
Blankenship, Stephanie A. [1 ]
Brown, Kristine E. [1 ]
Simon, Laura E. [2 ]
Stout, Molly J. [1 ]
Tuuli, Methodius G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Bernard Becker Med Lib, Sch Med St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
antenatal corticosteroids; fetal growth restriction; neonatal morbidity; neonatal mortality; small-for-gestational age; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; TERM OUTCOMES; BIRTH; GLUCOCORTICOIDS; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; STEROIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100215
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration on neonatal mortality and morbidity in preterm small-for-gestational age infants through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: A predefined, systematic search was conducted through Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials gov yielding 5324 articles from 1970 to 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies compared neonatal morbidity and mortality among small-for-gestational age infants delivered preterm who received antenatal corticosteroids with those who did not. METHODS: The primary outcome was neonatal mortality. Secondary outcomes were respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or chronic lung disease of prematurity, or neonatal sepsis. We assessed heterogeneity by means of Higgins 12 statistic and Cochran's Q test and calculated pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals using random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 16 observational cohort and case-control studies published from 1995 to 2018 met the selection criteria for the systematic review and included 8989 preterm small-for-gestational age infants. Antenatal corticosteroid administration was explicitly reported among 8376 small-for-gestational age infants; 4631 (55.3%) received antenatal corticosteroids and 3741 (44.7%) did not. Of note, 13 studies including 6387 preterm small-for-gestational age infants were then included in the meta-analysis. Neonatal mortality was significantly lower among infants who received antenatal corticosteroids than those who did not (12 studies: 12.8% vs 15.1%; pooled odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.86), with significant heterogeneity between studies (I-2=55.1%; P=.011). There was no significant difference in respiratory distress syndrome (12 studies: odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.15), necrotizing enterocolitis (7 studies: odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.22), intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia (10 studies: odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.20), bronchopulmonary dysplasia or chronic lung disease of prematurity (8 studies: odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.41), or neonatal sepsis (6 studies: odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.49). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that antenatal corticosteroid administration reduces neonatal mortality in small-for-gestational age infants delivered preterm, with no apparent effect on neonatal morbidity. This supports the use of antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal mortality in pregnancies with small-for-gestational age infants at risk of preterm birth.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Management of fetal growth restriction [J].
Alberry, M. ;
Soothill, P. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2007, 92 (01) :F62-F67
[2]   Antenatal Corticosteroids for Reducing Adverse Maternal and Child Outcomes in Special Populations of Women at Risk of Imminent Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Amiya, Rachel M. ;
Mlunde, Linda B. ;
Ota, Erika ;
Swa, Toshiyuki ;
Oladapo, Olufemi T. ;
Mori, Rintaro .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02)
[3]  
Atarod Z, 2014, J RES MED SCI, V19, P715
[4]   Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction [J].
Bernstein, IM ;
Horbar, JD ;
Badger, GJ ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Golan, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (01) :198-206
[5]   De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote [J].
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Giustini, Dean ;
de Jonge, Gerdien B. ;
Holland, Leslie ;
Bekhuis, Tanja .
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2016, 104 (03) :240-243
[6]   Brain-Sparing in Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Considerations for the Neonatologist [J].
Cohen, Emily ;
Baerts, Willem ;
van Bel, Frank .
NEONATOLOGY, 2015, 108 (04) :269-276
[7]  
Collaborative Study Group for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants, 2017, Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi, V55, P613, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.08.013
[8]  
Cunningham FG., 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTET, V19
[9]   The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions [J].
Downs, SH ;
Black, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :377-384
[10]  
ECONOMIDES D L, 1988, Fetal Therapy, V3, P158