On the strategic behavior of large investors: A mean-variance portfolio approach

被引:6
作者
Villena, Marcelo J. [1 ]
Reus, Lorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Sci & Engn, Diagonal Torres 2640, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Investment analysis; Large investors; Strategic behavior; Markowitz portfolio allocation; Nash equilibrium; TRADING VOLUME; LIQUIDITY RISK; SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; ARBITRAGE; MARKETS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.026
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
One key assumption of Markowitz's model is that all traders act as price takers. In this paper, we extend this mean-variance approach in a setting where large investors can move prices. Instead of having an individual optimization problem, we find the investors' Nash equilibrium and redefine the efficient frontier in this new framework. We also develop a simplified application of the general model, with two assets and two investors to shed light on the potential strategic behavior of large and atomic investors. Our findings validate the claim that large investors enhance their portfolio performance in relation to perfect market conditions. Besides, we show under which conditions atomic investors can benefit in relation to the standard setting, even if they have not total influence on their eventual performance. The 'two investors-two assets' setting allows us to quantify performance and do sensitivity analysis regarding investors' market power, risk tolerance and price elasticity of demand. Finally, for a group of well known ETFs, we empirically show how price variations change depending on the volume traded. We also explain how to set up and use our model with real market data. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 688
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors
[2]   Hedging and portfolio optimization in financial markets with a large trader [J].
Bank, P ;
Baum, D .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2004, 14 (01) :1-18
[3]  
Black F., 1992, Financial Analysts Journal, V48, P28, DOI DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V48.N5.28
[4]   Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Transaction Costs: Heuristics and Dual Bounds [J].
Brown, David B. ;
Smith, James E. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (10) :1752-1770
[5]   TRADING VOLUME AND SERIAL-CORRELATION IN STOCK RETURNS [J].
CAMPBELL, JY ;
GROSSMAN, SJ ;
WANG, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 108 (04) :905-939
[6]   Liquidity risk and arbitrage pricing theory [J].
Çetin, U ;
Jarrow, RA ;
Protter, P .
FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2004, 8 (03) :311-341
[7]   THE BEHAVIOR OF STACK PRICES AROUND INSTITUTIONAL TRADES [J].
CHAN, LKC ;
LAKONISHOK, J .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1995, 50 (04) :1147-1174
[8]   Portfolio constraints and the fundamental law of active management [J].
Clarke, R ;
de Silva, H ;
Thorley, S .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2002, 58 (05) :48-66
[9]   Optimal consumption choices for a 'large' investor [J].
Cuoco, D ;
Cvitanic, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1998, 22 (03) :401-436
[10]   The Price Impact of Institutional Herding [J].
Dasgupta, Amil ;
Prat, Andrea ;
Verardo, Michela .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2011, 24 (03) :892-925