Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review

被引:54
作者
Martin, Faith
Camfield, Laura
Rodham, Karen
Kliempt, Petra
Ruta, Danny
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp, Wolfson Hyperbar Med Unit, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Populat & Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
quality of life; outcome assessment; psychometrics; Patient Generated Index; individualised QoL;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualised quality of life (QoL) measure that has been in use since 1994. Various adaptations have been made to suit a variety of client groups. The PGI's psychometric properties have been studied but their review is necessary to inform instrument choice. This article provides a structured review, using grading criteria adapted from those developed to aid outcome measure selection for use with older people. These criteria grade quality of evidence and strength of findings for psychometric validity, providing a useful model for future reviews. All published articles providing data addressing validity, reliability and/or responsiveness were included in the review. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and analysed using the grading criteria. Variable results and quality of investigation were seen. Generally the measure was found to be adequately reliable for group comparisons. The PGI appeared valid but evidence for responsiveness was unclear. Those versions of the measure using fewer points in their Likert scales may have higher reliability. Cognitions involved in QoL judgements remain little understood and investigations of psychometric properties may be enhanced by examination of appraisal processes.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 715
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Using the patient generated index to evaluate response shift post-stroke [J].
Ahmed, S ;
Mayo, NE ;
Wood-Dauphinee, S ;
Hanley, JA ;
Cohen, S .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (10) :2247-2257
[2]   Quality of life: A dynamic construct [J].
Allison, PJ ;
Locker, D ;
Feine, JS .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (02) :221-230
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INDIVIDUAL QUALITY L
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   A post-discharge quality of life outcome measure for lower limb amputees: test-retest reliability and construct validity [J].
Callaghan, BG ;
Condie, ME .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (08) :858-864
[6]   Patient Generated Index: New instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with rectal cancer [J].
Camilleri-Brennan, J ;
Ruta, DA ;
Steele, RJC .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (11) :1354-1359
[7]   Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model [J].
Cummins, RA .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2000, 52 (01) :55-72
[8]   Open access publishing takes off - The dream is now achievable [J].
Delamothe, T ;
Smith, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7430) :1-3
[9]   How well do elderly people complete individualised quality of life measures: An exploratory study [J].
Dempster, M ;
Donnelly, M .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (04) :369-375
[10]   Generic, disease-specific and individualised approaches to measuring health-related quality of life among people with heart disease - A comparative analysis [J].
Dempster, M ;
Donnelly, M ;
Fitzsimons, D .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2002, 17 (04) :447-457