Familiarization, validity and smallest detectable difference of the isometric squat test in evaluating maximal strength

被引:32
作者
Drake, David [1 ,2 ]
Kennedy, Rodney [1 ,3 ]
Wallace, Eric [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Sch Sport, Shore Rd, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Irish Rugby Football Union, Ulster Rugby, Newtownabbey, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Ulster Univ, Sport & Exercise Sci Res Inst, Newtownabbey, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Strength-trained; responsiveness; stability reliability; squat performance; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; RUGBY UNION PLAYERS; JUMP PERFORMANCE; FORCE-PRODUCTION; STATISTICAL-METHODS; DYNAMIC STRENGTH; SPORTS-MEDICINE; MIDTHIGH PULL; BACK SQUAT; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.1080/02640414.2018.1436857
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Isometric multi-joint tests are considered reliable and have strong relationships with 1RM performance. However, limited evidence is available for the isometric squat in terms of effects of familiarization and reliability. This study aimed to assess, the effect of familiarization, stability reliability, determine the smallest detectible difference, and the correlation of the isometric squat test with 1RM squat performance. Thirty-six strength-trained participants volunteered to take part in this study. Following three familiarization sessions, test-retest reliability was evaluated with a 48-hour window between each time point. Isometric squat peak, net and relative force were assessed. Results showed three familiarizations were required, isometric squat had a high level of stability reliability and smallest detectible difference of 11% for peak and relative force. Isometric strength at a knee angle of ninety degrees had a strong significant relationship with 1RM squat performance. In conclusion, the isometric squat is a valid test to assess multi-joint strength and can discriminate between strong and weak 1RM squat performance. Changes greater than 11% in peak and relative isometric squat performance should be considered as meaningful in participants who are familiar with the test.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2095
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[11]   Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness [J].
Beckerman, H ;
Roebroeck, ME ;
Lankhorst, GJ ;
Becher, JG ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Verbeek, ALM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :571-578
[12]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[13]  
Blazevich AJ, 2002, J STRENGTH COND RES, V16, P298
[14]   A Comparison of the Isometric Midthigh Pull and Isometric Squat: Intraday Reliability, Usefulness, and the Magnitude of Difference Between Tests [J].
Brady, Claire J. ;
Harrison, Andrew J. ;
Flanagan, Eamonn P. ;
Haff, G. Gregory ;
Comyns, Thomas M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 13 (07) :844-852
[15]   Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement [J].
Buckner, Samuel L. ;
Jessee, Matthew B. ;
Mattocks, Kevin T. ;
Mouser, J. Grant ;
Counts, Brittany R. ;
Dankel, Scott J. ;
Loenneke, Jeremy P. .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (02) :193-195
[16]   Adaptations during familiarization to resistive exercise [J].
Calder, Kristina M. ;
Gabriel, David A. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) :328-335
[17]  
Chandler T.J., 1991, NSCA J, V13, P51, DOI DOI 10.1519/0744-0049(1991)013<LESS
[18]   Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review [J].
Charles, Pierre ;
Giraudeau, Bruno ;
Dechartres, Agnes ;
Baron, Gabriel ;
Ravaud, Philippe .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1256
[19]   RELIABILITY OF MAXIMAL BACK SQUAT AND POWER CLEAN PERFORMANCES IN INEXPERIENCED ATHLETES [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
McMahon, John J. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (11) :3089-3096
[20]   Effect of Knee and Trunk Angle on Kinetic Variables During the Isometric Midthigh Pull: Test-Retest Reliability [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
Jones, Paul A. ;
McMahon, John J. ;
Newton, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 10 (01) :58-63