Emissions assessment of bike sharing schemes: The case of Just Eat Cycles in Edinburgh, UK

被引:35
作者
D'Almeida, Lea [1 ]
Rye, Tom [2 ,3 ]
Pomponi, Francesco [4 ]
机构
[1] Paris Sch Urban Engn, Paris, France
[2] Molde Univ Coll, Dept Logist, Molde, Norway
[3] Urban Planning Inst Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Mobility; Bike sharing schemes; Carbon emissions; Life cycle analysis; Rebalancing operations; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2021.103012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Transport accounts for 40 % of global emissions, 72 % of which comes from road transport, and private cars are responsible for 60 % of road transport emissions. In cities, self-service bike sharing systems are quickly developing and are intended to offer an alternative and cleaner mode of transport than the car. However, the sustainability of such schemes is often taken as a given, rather than thoroughly evaluated. To address this gap, in this paper we undertake a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a public self-service bike sharing system in the city of Edinburgh, UK, modelling the production, operation and disposal elements of the system, but discounting additional food intake by users. Our results show that the bike sharing scheme is saving carbon dioxide equivalent emissions compared to the modes of transport by which its users previously travelled, but it is essential to optimize rebalancing operations and to manufacture bikes as near as possible to the point of use to further reduce carbon emissions; and that the overall emissions impacts of the scheme are critically dependent on how public transport providers respond to reductions in demand as users shift trips to bikeshare, since most trips transfer from walk and public transport, not private car. The policy implications for authorities seeking to use BSS as a GHG reduction intervention are not straightforward.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs
[2]  
BEIS, 2019, EL GEN SUPPL FIG SCO
[3]   Life cycle assessment to quantify the impact of technology improvements in bike-sharing systems [J].
Bonilla-Alicea, Ricardo Javier ;
Watson, Bryan C. ;
Shen, Ziheng ;
Tamayo, Laura ;
Telenko, Cassandra .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) :138-148
[4]   Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City [J].
Campbell, Kayleigh B. ;
Brakewood, Candace .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 100 :264-282
[5]   Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions of bike sharing in China: Production, operation, and recycling [J].
Chen, Jingrui ;
Zhou, Dan ;
Zhao, Yue ;
Wu, Bohong ;
Wu, Tian .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 162
[6]   Comparative environmental impacts of electric bikes in China [J].
Cherry, Christopher R. ;
Weinert, Jonathan X. ;
Xinmiao, Yang .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (05) :281-290
[7]  
Curran M.A., 2008, ENCY ECOLOGY, P2168, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471238961.LIFEGUIN.A01.PUB2, 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00629-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00629-7]
[8]   Bicycle sharing system 'success' determinants [J].
de Chardon, Cyrille Medard ;
Caruso, Geoffrey ;
Thomas, Isabelle .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 100 :202-214
[9]  
DeMaio, 2019, BIKE SHARING WORLD M
[10]  
DeMaio P., 2009, Journal of Public Transportation., V12, DOI [10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3, DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3]