Pharmacological treatment for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

被引:22
|
作者
Pani, Pier Paolo [1 ]
Vacca, Rosangela [1 ]
Trogu, Emanuela [1 ]
Amato, Laura [2 ]
Davoli, Marina [2 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Dist 8 ASL 8 Cagliari, Social Hlth Div, I-09127 Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
[2] ASL RM E, Dept Epidemiol, Rome, Italy
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2010年 / 09期
关键词
DSM-III-R; METHADONE-MAINTENANCE PATIENTS; STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITY; SUBSTANCE USE; DRUG-ABUSE; FOLLOW-UP; DESIPRAMINE TREATMENT; MEDICATION ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD008373.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lifetime prevalence of depression in subjects with opioid dependence is higher than in the general population (44-54% versus 16%) and represents a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. For patients on opioid agonist treatment, current prevalence rates of depression ranges between 10 and 30%, influencing negatively the outcome of the treatment. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and the acceptability of antidepressants for the treatment of depressed opioid dependents treated with opioid agonists. Search strategy We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHL (to October 2009), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Cochrane Drug and Alcohol Group Specialised Register, issue 4, 2009), main electronic sources of ongoing trials, specific trial databases and reference lists of all relevant papers. Selection criteria Randomised and controlled clinical trials examining the efficacy of any antidepressant medication to treat depressed opioid dependents in treatment with opioid agonists. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently screened and extracted data from studies. Main results Seven studies, 482 participants, met the inclusion criteria. - Comparing antidepressant with placebo, no statistically significant results for dropouts. Selecting studies with low risk of bias, 325 participants, results favour placebo, RR1.40 (Cl 95% 1.00 to 1.96). For severity of depression, results from two studies, 183 participants, favour antidepressants utilising Clinical Global Impression Scale RR 1.92 (CI 95% 1.26 to 2.94), while another study, 95 participants,utilising the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, did not find a statistically significant difference RR 0.96 (CI 95% 0.54 to 1.71). For adverse events, result favour placebo, four studies, 311 participants, RR 2.90 (Cl 95% 1.23 to 6.86). For drug use, three studies, 211 participants, it was not possible to pool data because outcomes' measures were not comparable. Looking at singular studies, no statistically significant difference was seen. - Comparing different classes of antidepressants, the results favour tricyclics for severity of depression, two studies, 183 participants, RR 1.92 (Cl 95% 1.26 to 2.94) and favour placebo for adverse events, two studies, 172 participants, RR 3.11 (Cl 95% 1.06 to 9.12). Authors' conclusions There is low evidence, at the present, supporting the clinical use of antidepressants for the treatment of depressed opioid addicts in treatment with opioid agonists. There is a need of larger randomised studies investigating relevant outcomes, safety issues and reporting data to allow comparison of results.
引用
收藏
页数:81
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Supervised Injectable Opioid Treatment for the Management of Opioid Dependence
    Bell, James
    Belackova, Vendula
    Lintzeris, Nicholas
    DRUGS, 2018, 78 (13) : 1339 - 1352
  • [42] Psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence in Germany: problems and perspectives
    Deimel, Daniel
    Stoever, Heino
    HEROIN ADDICTION AND RELATED CLINICAL PROBLEMS, 2015, 17 (2-3) : 51 - 58
  • [43] Alcohol use in opioid agonist treatment
    Nolan S.
    Klimas J.
    Wood E.
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 11 (1)
  • [44] Sleep reductions associated with illicit opioid use and clinic-hour changes during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence: Measurement by electronic diary and actigraphy
    Bertz, Jeremiah W.
    Epstein, David H.
    Reamer, David
    Kowalczyk, William J.
    Phillips, Karran A.
    Kennedy, Ashley P.
    Jobes, Michelle L.
    Ward, Greg
    Plitnick, Barbara A.
    Figueiro, Mariana G.
    Rea, Mark S.
    Preston, Kenzie L.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2019, 106 : 43 - 57
  • [45] Using behavioral economics to predict opioid use during prescription opioid dependence treatment
    Worley, Matthew J.
    Shoptaw, Steven J.
    Bickel, Warren K.
    Ling, Walter
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2015, 148 : 62 - 68
  • [46] Postoperative opioid misuse in patients with opioid use disorders maintained on opioid agonist treatment
    Namiranian, Khodadad
    Siglin, Jonathan
    Sorkin, John David
    Norris, Edward J.
    Aghevli, Minu
    Covington, Edward C.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2020, 109 : 8 - 13
  • [47] Clinical update of opioid agonist and partial agonist medications for the maintenance treatment of opioid addiction
    Kreek, MJ
    SEMINARS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (3-4) : 140 - 157
  • [48] Opioid Agonist Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder patients in Central Asia
    Michels, Ingo Ilja
    Stover, Heino
    Aizberg, Oleg
    Boltaev, Azizbek
    HEROIN ADDICTION AND RELATED CLINICAL PROBLEMS, 2021, 23 (01) : 33 - 46
  • [49] HEROIN AND PRESCRIPTION OPIOID DEPENDENCE IN OPIOID PHARMACOTHERAPY TREATMENT IN AUSTRALIA
    Jefferson, Amber
    Baker, Tom
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2014, 33 : 33 - 33
  • [50] Maintenance treatment with depot opioid antagonists in subcutaneous implants:: an alternative in the treatment of opioid dependence
    Carreño, JE
    Alvarez, CE
    San Narciso, GI
    Bascaran, MT
    Díaz, M
    Bobes, J
    ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2003, 8 (04) : 429 - 438