Process structure-based recurrent neural network modeling for predictive control: A comparative study

被引:39
作者
Alhajeri, Mohammed S. [1 ,5 ]
Luo, Junwei [1 ]
Wu, Zhe [3 ]
Albalawi, Fahad [4 ]
Christofides, Panagiotis D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore 117585, Singapore
[4] Taif Univ, Dept Elect Engn, POB 11099, At Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[5] Kuwait Univ, Dept Chem Engn, POB 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Process control; Model predictive control; Nonlinear processes; Machine learning; Recurrent neural networks; Aspen Plus Dynamics; UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATION; MACHINE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.12.046
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Recurrent neural networks (RNN) have demonstrated their ability in providing a remarkably accurate modeling approximation to describe the dynamic evolution of complex, nonlinear chemical processes in several applications. Although conventional fully-connected RNN models have been successfully utilized in model predictive control (MPC) to regulate chemical processes with desired approximation accuracy, the development of RNN models in terms of model structure can be further improved by incorporating physical knowledge to achieve better accuracy and computational efficiency. This work investigates the performance of MPC based on two different RNN structures. Specifically, a fully-connected RNN model, and a partially-connected RNN model developed using a prior physical knowledge, are considered. This study uses an example of a large-scale complex chemical process simulated by Aspen Plus Dynamics to demonstrate improvements in the RNN model and an RNN-based MPC performance, when the prior knowledge of the process is taken into account.(c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Tuning Guidelines for Model-Predictive Control
    Alhajeri, Mohammed
    Soroush, Masoud
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (10) : 4177 - 4191
  • [2] Machine-learning-based state estimation and predictive control of nonlinear processes
    Alhajeri, Mohammed S.
    Wu, Zhe
    Rincon, David
    Albalawi, Fahad
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2021, 167 : 268 - 280
  • [3] Banerjee A, 2017, INT J IND CHEM, V8, P253, DOI 10.1007/s40090-017-0122-3
  • [4] Camacho E. F., 2013, MODEL PREDICTIVE CON, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-398-5
  • [5] UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATION TO NONLINEAR OPERATORS BY NEURAL NETWORKS WITH ARBITRARY ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS AND ITS APPLICATION TO DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
    CHEN, TP
    CHEN, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1995, 6 (04): : 911 - 917
  • [6] First-principle-data-integrated machine-learning approach for high-throughput searching of ternary electrocatalyst toward oxygen reduction reaction
    Chun, Hoje
    Lee, Eunjik
    Nam, Kyungju
    Jang, Ji-Hoon
    Kyoung, Woomin
    Noh, Seung Hyo
    Han, Byungchan
    [J]. CHEM CATALYSIS, 2021, 1 (04): : 855 - 869
  • [7] Hybrid modelling of biochemical processes: A comparison with the conventional approach
    deAzevedo, SF
    Dahm, B
    Oliveira, FR
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 21 : S751 - S756
  • [8] Ellis M., 2017, Economic model predictive control, V5
  • [9] Hybrid Modeling Approach Integrating First-Principles Models with Subspace Identification
    Ghosh, Debanjan
    Hermonat, Emma
    Mhaskar, Prashant
    Snowling, Spencer
    Goel, Rajeev
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (30) : 13533 - 13543
  • [10] The validity domain of hybrid models and its application in process optimization
    Kahrs, O.
    Marquardt, W.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2007, 46 (11) : 1054 - 1066