Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills - Construct and concurrent validity

被引:108
作者
Moorthy, K [1 ]
Munz, Y [1 ]
Dosis, A [1 ]
Bello, F [1 ]
Chang, A [1 ]
Darzi, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol & Technol, London W2 1NY, England
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2004年 / 18卷 / 11期
关键词
technical skills and surgery; laparoscopic skills and assessment; motion analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-003-9312-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The assessment of technical skills should provide objective feedback and judge suitability of progress during training. The aim of this study was to validate two objective assessment techniques for laparoscopic suturing and demonstrate a correlation between them. Methods.- Six experts, seven surgeons skilled in laparoscopic suturing, and 13 with no laparoscopic suturing skills were asked to place two or three intracorporeal sutures on a synthetic suture pad. The latter group was given video-based instructions prior to the execution of the sutures. Ergonomic conditions were standardized for all subjects. The procedures were recorded on videotape and two blinded observers rated the first suture of each subject on a 29-point checklist. A motion analysis system, Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device, was used to assess psychomotor skills. Results: There was a significant difference in the time taken (p = 0.000) and total path length (p = 0.000) per suture across the groups. There were also a significant difference in the total checklist score (p = 0.000) and its individual categories. The was a strong correlation between the total path length and the total checklist score (coefficient, 0.78; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A combination of the motion analysis system and the checklist would make the process of formative feedback during the learning of intracorporeal suturing objective and comprehensive.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1612
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Significance of "hands-on training" in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Mori, T ;
Hatano, N ;
Maruyama, S ;
Atomi, Y .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (03) :256-260
[12]   SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 100 INITIAL PATIENTS [J].
PETERS, JH ;
ELLISON, EC ;
INNES, JT ;
LISS, JL ;
NICHOLS, KE ;
LOMANO, JM ;
ROBY, SR ;
FRONT, ME ;
CAREY, LC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 213 (01) :3-12
[13]   Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination [J].
Regehr, G ;
MacRae, H ;
Reznick, RK ;
Szalay, D .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (09) :993-997
[14]   TEACHING AND TESTING TECHNICAL SKILLS [J].
REZNICK, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (03) :358-361
[15]  
Rosser JC, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P200
[16]   Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons [J].
Rosser, JC ;
Rosser, LE ;
Savalgi, RS .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (06) :657-661
[17]   TEACHING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - THE NEED FOR GUIDELINES [J].
ROYSTON, CMS ;
LANSDOWN, MRJ ;
BROUGH, WA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6935) :1023-1025
[18]   LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED COLECTOMY LEARNING-CURVE [J].
SIMONS, AJ ;
ANTHONE, GJ ;
ORTEGA, AE ;
FRANKLIN, M ;
FLESHMAN, J ;
GEIS, WP ;
BEART, RW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (06) :600-603
[19]   Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills [J].
Smith, CD ;
Farrell, TM ;
McNatt, SS ;
Metreveli, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 181 (06) :547-550
[20]   Motion analysis - A tool for assessing laparoscopic dexterity in the performance of a laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Smith, SGT ;
Torkington, J ;
Brown, TJ ;
Taffinder, NJ ;
Darzi, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (04) :640-645