Incidence, Management, and Prevention of Right Ventricular Perforation by Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads

被引:60
作者
Migliore, Federico [1 ]
Zorzi, Alessandro [1 ]
Bertaglia, Emanuele [1 ]
Leoni, Loira [1 ]
Siciliano, Mariachiara [1 ]
De Lazzari, Manuel [1 ]
Ignatiuk, Barbara [2 ]
Veronese, Marta [3 ]
Verlato, Roberto [4 ]
Tarantini, Giuseppe [1 ]
Iliceto, Sabino [1 ]
Corrado, Domenico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Sci, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[2] Hosp Este, Div Cardiol, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Div Radiol, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[4] Hosp Camposampiero, Div Cardiol, Padua, Italy
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2014年 / 37卷 / 12期
关键词
cardiac perforation; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; pacemaker; lead extraction; lead failure; ICD LEAD; COMPLICATIONS; SUBACUTE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/pace.12472
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiac perforation of the right ventricle (RV) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of both pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant. Appropriate management is still uncertain. We assessed the incidence of subacute (24 hours-1 month) or delayed (>1 month) cardiac perforation by RV lead and the results of percutaneous lead extraction. Method: The study population included all patients diagnosed with subacute or delayed RV-lead perforation during the period 2007-2013. The incidence of perforation according to device type and fixation mechanism was calculated. The outcome of the percutaneous approach, consisting of lead extraction by simple traction, was assessed. Results: Cardiac perforation was diagnosed in 14 (eight females, mean age 71 [range 47-83] years) patients out of 3,815 who received an RV-lead implant (0.4%). The overall incidence of RV-lead perforation was similar between ICD (0.3%) and PM (0.4%) implants (P = 1.0) and between active (0.5%) and passive (0.3%) fixation leads (P = 0.3). All perforating leads were originally placed at the RV apex. Five patients were asymptomatic, but all presented altered lead electrical parameters. Surgical removal of the lead was performed in one patient while in the remaining the leads were successfully extracted by direct manual traction in the absence of any complications. In all patients, new active fixation leads were positioned in the RV septum and the follow-up (42 +/- 27 months) was uneventful. Conclusions: RV perforation is a rare complication of both PM and ICD implants, regardless of the lead fixation mechanism. In most patients, percutaneous lead extraction is a safe and effective management approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1602 / 1609
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] Incidence and predictors of cardiac perforation after permanent pacemaker placement
    Mahapatra, S
    Bybee, KA
    Bunch, TJ
    Espinosa, RE
    Sinak, LJ
    McGoon, MD
    Hayes, DL
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (09) : 907 - 911
  • [12] Asymptomatic right ventricular perforation by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead detected by home monitoring system
    Migliore, Federico
    Leoni, Loira
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Guglielmi, Cosimo
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Buja, Gianfranco
    Iliceto, Sabino
    Corrado, Domenico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2010, 43 (06) : 673 - 675
  • [13] Selective site pacing: The future of cardiac pacing?
    Mond, HG
    Gammage, MD
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (06): : 835 - 836
  • [14] Validation of Conventional Fluoroscopic and ECG Criteria for Right Ventricular Pacemaker Lead Position Using Cardiac Computed Tomography
    Pang, Benjamin J.
    Joshi, Subodh B.
    Lui, Elaine H.
    Tacey, Mark A.
    Ling, Liang-Han
    Alison, Jeff
    Seneviratne, Sujith K.
    Cameron, James D.
    Mond, Harry G.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (04): : 495 - 504
  • [15] Heart perforation in patients with permanent cardiac pacing - pilot personal observations
    Piekarz, Justyna
    Lelakowski, Jacek
    Rydlewska, Anna
    Majewski, Jacek
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 8 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [16] Clinical Performance of the St. Jude Medical Riata Defibrillation Lead in a Large Patient Population
    Porterfield, James G.
    Porterfield, Linda M.
    Kuck, Karl H.
    Corbisiero, Raffaele
    Greenberg, Steven M.
    Hindricks, Gerhard
    Wazni, Oussama
    Beau, Scott L.
    Herre, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) : 551 - 556
  • [17] Late Perforation by Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Leads: Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Clues, and Management
    Refaat, Marwan M.
    Hashash, Jana G.
    Shalaby, Alaa A.
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (08) : 466 - 475
  • [18] Satpathy R, 2008, PACE, V31, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00919.x
  • [19] Rates and severity of perforation from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: A 4-year study
    Turakhia, Mintu
    Prasad, Megha
    Olgin, Jeffrey
    Badhwar, Nitish
    Tseng, Zian H.
    Lee, Randall
    Marcus, Gregory M.
    Lee, Byron K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [20] Transvenous Lead Extraction: Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus on Facilities, Training, Indications, and Patient Management
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Love, Charles J.
    Byrd, Charles L.
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Carrillo, Roger G.
    Crossley, George H., III
    Epstein, Laurence M.
    Friedman, Richard A.
    Kennergren, Charles E. H.
    Mitkowski, Przemyslaw
    Schaerf, Raymond H. M.
    Wazni, Oussama M.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2009, 6 (07) : 1085 - 1104