Follow-up for screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: Results of a survey of UK centres participating in the Sloane project

被引:8
作者
Maxwell, A. J. [1 ]
Evans, A. J. [2 ]
Carpenter, R. [3 ]
Dobson, H. M. [4 ]
Kearins, O. [5 ]
Clements, K. [5 ]
Lawrence, G. [5 ]
Bishop, H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Bolton Hosp, Bolton Breast Unit, Bolton BL4 0JR, England
[2] City Hosp, Nottingham Breast Inst, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[3] St Bartholomews Hosp, London EC1A 7BE, England
[4] W Scotland Breast Screening Ctr, Glasgow G2 1QT, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Birmingham, W Midlands Canc Intelligence Unit, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
来源
EJSO | 2009年 / 35卷 / 10期
关键词
Ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS; Mammography; BREAST-CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To investigate the variations in follow-up practice for screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the UK. Methods: A questionnaire enquiring about follow-up practice and the perceived value of clinical follow-up after surgery for screen-detected DCIS was sent to the 74 UK screening centres participating in the Sloane Project. Results: Responses were received from 66 hospitals serving 54 screening centres. These demonstrate wide variations in practice. Clinical follow-up duration ranges from 1 year to indefinite, with the frequency of visits from three-monthly to annually. Formal mammographic follow-up duration ranges from none to indefinite. Mammographic frequency ranges from 1 to 2 years. Follow-up varies according to factors such as size and grade of disease and margin status in 23 units and according to whether adjuvant therapy is given in 23. Seven hospitals perform mammography of reconstructed breasts. Thirty-one centres consider clinical follow-up of DCIS to be of value or limited value whereas 28 consider it to be of little or no value. Conclusions: There is no consensus with regard to the duration and frequency of follow-up for screen-detected DCIS, the contribution of predictive and treatment factors, the use of mammography of the reconstructed breast or the perceived value of clinical follow-up. Published guidelines show no consensus. Multidisciplinary teams involved in the care of women with screen-detected non-invasive cancer should contribute to audits such as the Sloane Project in order to determine the most effective and efficient ways to treat and follow up these patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1059
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EARL LOC ADV BREAST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CLIN PRACT GUID MAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PRACT GUID ONC
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIN MAN DUCT CARC S
[5]  
*ASS BREAST SURG B, 2005, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V31, pS1
[6]  
*EUR SOC MED ONC G, 2005, ANN ONCOL S1, V16, pI7
[7]   American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting [J].
Khatcheressian, James L. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. ;
Smith, Thomas J. ;
Grunfeld, Eva ;
Muss, Hyman B. ;
Vogel, Victor G. ;
Halberg, Francine ;
Somerfield, Mark R. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (31) :5091-5097
[8]   Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ [J].
Liberman, L ;
VanZee, KJ ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Morris, EA ;
Abramson, AF ;
Samli, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) :489-493
[9]   Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) [J].
Morrow, M ;
Strom, EA ;
Bassett, LW ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Fowble, B ;
Harris, JR ;
O'Malley, F ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Singletary, SE ;
Winchester, DP .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (05) :256-276
[10]   Recurrent cancer after breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: Mammographic features, method of detection, and stage of recurrence [J].
Pinsky, Renee W. ;
Rebner, Murray ;
Pierce, Lori J. ;
Ben-David, Merav A. ;
Vicini, Frank ;
Hunt, Karen A. ;
Helvie, Mark A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (01) :140-144