Adjusting for Pubertal Status Reduces Overweight and Obesity Prevalence in the United States

Objective To compare pediatric overweight and obesity prevalence among non-Hispanic white, Mexican American, and non-Hispanic black US youths before and after adjusting body mass index (BMI) for pubertal status, as assessed by Tanner stage. Study design We analyzed cross-sectional anthropometric and pubertal data from non-Hispanic white, Mexican American, and non-Hispanic black youths in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. We developed specialized Tanner stage and chronological age-adjusted models to establish Tanner-stage adjusted BMI z-scores, which were then used to determine adjusted overweight/obesity prevalence. We compared pediatric overweight/obesity prevalence before and after pubertal status adjustment. Results Among 3206 youths aged 8-18 years (50% male; 26% non-Hispanic white, 35% Mexican American, 39% non-Hispanic black), adjusting BMI for Tanner stage significantly reduced overweight (males, from 29% to 21%; females, from 29% to 17%) and obesity (males, from 14% to 7%; females, from 11% to 5%) prevalence across all races/ethnicities. The obesity prevalence reduction was more pronounced in Mexican Americans (males, 11% reduction; females, 9% reduction) and non-Hispanic blacks (males and females, 10% reduction) compared with non-Hispanic whites (males, 6% reduction; females, 5% reduction). Similar patterns were seen in overweight prevalence. Conclusions Adjusting for pubertal status reduced the prevalence of overweight/obesity in non-Hispanic white, Mexican American, and non-Hispanic black youth. This suggests that adjusting for puberty incorporates changes otherwise not captured when only considering the age of a child. Adjusting BMI for pubertal status may be important when interpreting a youth's weight status and consideration for obesity management, as well as when interpreting pediatric overweight/obesity prevalence data.