Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Surov, Alexey [1 ]
Meyer, Hans-Jonas [2 ]
Pech, Maciej [1 ]
Powerski, Maciej [1 ]
Omari, Jasan [1 ]
Wienke, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] Otto von Guericke Univ, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Epidemiol, Biostat & Informat, Halle, Saale, Germany
关键词
Rectal cancer; DWI; ADC; Lymph node; BREAST-CANCER; LESIONS; ADC; MRI; RESECTION; ACCURACY; KI-67; HEAD;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-021-03986-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. Methods MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. Results ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). Conclusion No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:2189 / 2197
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [2] Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Assessing Preoperative T Staging of Low Rectal Cancer and Whether This Is Correlated With Ki-67 Expression
    Ao, Weiqun
    Bao, Xiangdong
    Mao, Guoqun
    Yang, Guangzhao
    Wang, Jian
    Hu, Jinwen
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2020, 71 (01): : 5 - 11
  • [3] Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison
    Brown, G
    Richards, CJ
    Bourne, MW
    Newcombe, RG
    Radcliffe, AG
    Dallimore, NS
    Williams, GT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) : 371 - 377
  • [4] Initial Staging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Regional Lymph Nodes Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MRI With 18F-FDG-PET/CT
    Cerny, Milena
    Dunet, Vincent
    Prior, John Olivier
    Hahnloser, Dieter
    Wagner, Anna Dorothea
    Meuli, Reto Antoine
    Schmidt, Sabine
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (04) : 289 - 295
  • [5] Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: Systematic review
    Chang, George J.
    Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
    Skibber, John M.
    Moyer, Virginia A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (06) : 433 - 441
  • [6] Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in primary rectal cancer
    Cho, Een Young
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Yoon, Jung-Hee
    Lee, Yedaun
    Lim, Yun-Jung
    Kim, Seon-Jeong
    Baek, Hye Jin
    Eun, Choong Ki
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (11) : E662 - E668
  • [7] Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Cumpston, Miranda
    Li, Tianjing
    Page, Matthew J.
    Chandler, Jacqueline
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thomas, James
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10):
  • [8] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [9] Feasibility and reproducibility of T2 mapping and DWI for identifying malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer
    Ge, Yu-xi
    Hu, Shu-dong
    Wang, Zi
    Guan, Rong-ping
    Zhou, Xin-yi
    Gao, Qi-zhong
    Yan, Gen
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) : 3347 - 3354
  • [10] Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Georgiou, Panagiotis
    Tan, Emile
    Gouvas, Nikolaos
    Antoniou, Anthony
    Brown, Gina
    Nicholls, R. John
    Tekkis, Paris
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2009, 10 (11) : 1053 - 1062