Survival outcomes following pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: A population-based study

被引:6
|
作者
Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Zubizarreta, Jose [3 ,4 ]
Nitecki, Roni [1 ]
Melamed, Alexander [5 ]
Fu, Shuangshuang [2 ]
Jorgensen, Kirsten [1 ]
Brady, Paula C. [6 ]
Baker, Valerie L. [7 ]
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana [2 ,8 ]
Giordano, Sharon H. [2 ,8 ]
Keating, Nancy L. [3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, 1155 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
assisted reproductive technologies; breast cancer; pregnancy; risk-set matching; survival; YOUNG-WOMEN; FERTILITY; SAFETY; RISK; AGE; METAANALYSIS; PREFERENCES; SENSITIVITY; CARCINOMA; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.34371
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background This study sought to determine the impact of pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on breast-cancer-specific survival among breast cancer survivors. Methods The authors performed a cohort study using a novel data linkage from the California Cancer Registry, the California birth cohort, and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data sets. They performed risk-set matching in women with stages I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. For each pregnant woman, comparable women who were not pregnant at that point but were otherwise similar based on observed characteristics were matched at the time of pregnancy. After matching, Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of pregnancy with breast-cancer-specific survival. We repeated these analyses for women who received ART. Results Among 30,021 women with breast cancer, 553 had a pregnancy and 189 attempted at least one cycle of ART. In Cox proportional hazards modeling, the pregnancy group had a higher 5-year disease-specific survival rate; 95.6% in the pregnancy group and 90.6% in the nonpregnant group (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77). In women with hormone receptor-positive cancer, we found similar results (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.2-0.91). In the ART analysis, there was no difference in survival between groups; the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 96.9% in the ART group and 94.1% in the non-ART group (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.17-1.13). Conclusion Pregnancy and ART are not associated with worse survival in women with breast cancer. Lay summary We sought to determine the impact of pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies (ART) among breast cancer survivors. We performed a study of 30,021 women by linking available data from California and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. For each pregnant woman, we matched at the time of pregnancy comparable women who were not pregnant at that point but were otherwise similar based on observed characteristics. We repeated these analyses for women who received ART. We found that pregnancy and ART were not associated with worse survival.
引用
收藏
页码:3243 / 3253
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study
    Meernik, Clare
    Jorgensen, Kirsten
    Wu, Chi-Fang
    Murphy, Caitlin C. C.
    Baker, Valerie L. L.
    Brady, Paula C. C.
    Nitecki, Roni
    Nichols, Hazel B. B.
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 198 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [2] Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study
    Clare Meernik
    Kirsten Jorgensen
    Chi-Fang Wu
    Caitlin C. Murphy
    Valerie L. Baker
    Paula C. Brady
    Roni Nitecki
    Hazel B. Nichols
    J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 198 : 149 - 158
  • [3] Pregnancy after breast cancer: A population-based study of survival and obstetric outcomes.
    Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro
    Nitecki, Roni
    Melamed, Alexander
    Zubizarreta, Jose
    Fu, Shuangshuang
    Clapp, Mark C.
    Brady, Paula C.
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Mac Gregor, Mariana Chavez
    Keating, Nancy Lynn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [4] Pregnancy and breast cancer: a population-based study
    Reed, W
    Hannisdal, E
    Skovlund, E
    Thoresen, S
    Lilleng, P
    Nesland, JM
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2003, 443 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [5] Pregnancy and breast cancer: a population-based study
    W. Reed
    E. Hannisdal
    E. Skovlund
    S. Thoresen
    P. Lilleng
    J. M. Nesland
    Virchows Archiv, 2003, 443 : 44 - 50
  • [6] Assisted Reproductive Technology During COVID-19: A Population-Based Study Of Pregnancy Outcomes
    Wei, Shu Qin
    Luu, Thuy Mai
    Ayoub, Aimina
    Lewin, Antoine
    Auger, Nathalie
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (11) : 3334 - 3342
  • [7] Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Cryptorchidism and Hypospadias: Population-Based Study
    Chodick, Gabriel
    Trabert, Britton
    Shalev, Varda
    McGlynn, Katherine A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 334 - 335
  • [8] Assisted reproductive technology treatment and risk of breast cancer: a population-based cohort study
    Vassard, D.
    Pinborg, A.
    Kamper-Jorgensen, M.
    Forman, J. Lyng
    Glazer, C. H.
    Kroman, N.
    Schmidt, L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (12) : 3152 - 3160
  • [9] Risk of Breast Cancer After Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Population-based Cohort Study
    Gill, Gurjot
    Giannakeas, Vasily
    Read, Stephanie
    Lega, Iliana C.
    Shah, Baiju R.
    Lipscombe, Lorraine L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2024, 48 (03) : 171 - 178.e1
  • [10] Birth Outcomes by Infertility Treatment: Analyses of the Population-Based Cohort Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART)
    Luke, Barbara
    Stern, Judy E.
    Kotelchuck, Milton
    Declercq, Eugene R.
    Anderka, Marlene
    Diop, Hafsatou
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 61 (3-4) : 114 - 127