How ecosystem services are changing: an accounting application at the EU level

被引:59
作者
Vallecillo, Sara [1 ]
La Notte, Alessandra [1 ]
Ferrini, Silvia [2 ,3 ]
Maes, Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
[2] Univ East Anglia, CSERGE, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ Siena, Dept Polit & Int Sci, Siena, Italy
关键词
Supply table; Use table; Official statistics; Spatial models; Drivers of changes; Monetary value; DECISION-MAKING; DEMAND; PRESSURE; CAPACITY; SYSTEMS; AREAS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101044
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services accounts are a useful tool that provides relevant information on the role of ecosystems in delivering services, and the society benefiting from them. This paper presents the accounting workflow for ecosystem services at the European Union level adopted by the Knowledge Innovation Project on an Integrated system for Natural Capital and ecosystem services Accounting (KIP INCA) - a European Commission initiative. The workflow includes: 1) biophysical assessment of ecosystem services; 2) monetary valuation; and 3) compilation of accounting tables. Supply and use tables are presented for six ecosystem services assessed so far. The supply table shows woodland and forest, followed by wetlands, as the ecosystem types with the highest monetary value per unit area. Analyses of changes between 2000 and 2012 show an overall increase of the monetary value of ecosystem services, mainly due to an increase in demand for them. We also discuss advantages and disadvantages of adopting a fast-track approach, based on official statistics, in comparison to an accounting strategy based on spatial models. We propose a novel workflow for ecosystem services accounts, focused on assessment of the actual flow of ecosystem services, making a significant contribution to further development of the technical recommendations for ecosystem services accounts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, System of environmental economic accounting 2012: central framework
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, LANDSC ONLINE, DOI [DOI 10.3097/LO.201434, 10.3097/LO.201434]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, National emissions reported to the UNFCCC and to the EU greenhouse gas monitoring mechanism
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020: living well, within the limits of our planet
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, EFF CARB RAT PRIC CO
  • [6] Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Harwood, Amii R.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Watson, Robert T.
    Abson, David J.
    Andrews, Barnaby
    Binner, Amy
    Crowe, Andrew
    Day, Brett H.
    Dugdale, Steve
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Foden, Jo
    Hadley, David
    Haines-Young, Roy
    Hulme, Mark
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    Lovett, Andrew A.
    Munday, Paul
    Pascual, Unai
    Paterson, James
    Perino, Grischa
    Sen, Antara
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    van Soest, Daan
    Termansen, Mette
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) : 45 - 50
  • [7] Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security
    Bommarco, Riccardo
    Kleijn, David
    Potts, Simon G.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2013, 28 (04) : 230 - 238
  • [8] Britz W.P. Witzke., 2014, CAPRI model documentation 2014
  • [9] Bridging the Gap Between National and Ecosystem Accounting Application in Andalusian Forests, Spain
    Campos, Pablo
    Caparros, Alejandro
    Oviedo, Jose L.
    Ovando, Paola
    Alvarez-Farizo, Begona
    Diaz-Balteiro, Luis
    Carranza, Juan
    Begueria, Santiago
    Diaz, Mario
    Casimiro Herruzo, A.
    Martinez-Pena, Fernando
    Solino, Mario
    Alvarez, Alejandro
    Martinez-Jauregui, Maria
    Pasalodos-Tato, Maria
    de Frutos, Pablo
    Aldea, Jorge
    Almazan, Eloy
    Concepcion, Elena D.
    Mesa, Bruno
    Romero, Carlos
    Serrano-Notivoli, Roberto
    Fernandez, Cristina
    Torres-Porras, Jeronimo
    Montero, Gregorio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 157 : 218 - 236
  • [10] Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed
    Costanza, Robert
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (02) : 350 - 352