Texting and walking: Effect of environmental setting and task prioritization on dual-task interference in healthy young adults

被引:106
作者
Plummer, Prudence [1 ]
Apple, Sarah [2 ]
Dowd, Colleen [2 ]
Keith, Eliza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Allied Hlth Sci, Div Phys Therapy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Gait; Cognitive-motor interference; Attention; Prioritization; Texting; MOBILE PHONE USE; AMBULATORY SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; TALKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recent studies have shown that young adults significantly reduce their gait speed and weave more when texting while walking. Previous research has not examined the simultaneous dual-task effects on texting performance, therefore, the attention prioritization strategy used by young adults while texting and walking is not currently known. Moreover, it is not known whether laboratory-based studies accurately reflect texting and walking performance in the real world. This study compared dual-task interference during texting and walking between laboratory and real-world settings, and examined the ability of young adults to flexibly prioritize their attention between the two tasks in each environment. Texting and walking were assessed in single-task and three dual-task conditions (no-priority, gait-priority, texting-priority) in the lab and a University Student Center, in 32 healthy young adults. Dual-task effects on gait speed, texting speed, and texting accuracy were significant, but did not significantly differ between the two environments. Young adults were able to flexibly prioritize their attention between texting and walking, according to specific instruction, and this ability was not influenced by environmental setting. In the absence of instructions, young adults prioritized the texting task in the low-distraction environment, but displayed more equal focus between tasks in the real world. The finding that young adults do not significantly modify their texting and walking behavior in high-distraction environments lends weight to growing concerns about cell phone use and pedestrian safety. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 51
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluation of an ambulatory system for gait analysis in hip osteoarthritis and after total hip replacement [J].
Aminian, K ;
Trevisan, C ;
Najafi, B ;
Dejnabadi, H ;
Frigo, C ;
Pavan, E ;
Telonio, A ;
Cerati, F ;
Marinoni, EC ;
Robert, P ;
Leyvraz, PF .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2004, 20 (01) :102-107
[2]   Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes [J].
Aminian, K ;
Najafi, B ;
Büla, C ;
Leyvraz, PF ;
Robert, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 35 (05) :689-699
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J AGING RES
[4]  
Cohen J., 2013, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[5]   The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalised and unsignalised intersections [J].
Hatfield, Julie ;
Murphy, Susanne .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2007, 39 (01) :197-205
[6]   Did You See the Unicycling Clown? Inattentional Blindness while Walking and Talking on a Cell Phone [J].
Hyman, Ira E., Jr. ;
Boss, S. Matthew ;
Wise, Breanne M. ;
McKenzie, Kira E. ;
Caggiano, Jenna M. .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 24 (05) :597-607
[7]   Factors influencing dynamic prioritization during dual-task walking in healthy young adults [J].
Kelly, Valerie E. ;
Eusterbrock, Alexis J. ;
Shumway-Cook, Anne .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2013, 37 (01) :131-134
[8]   Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults [J].
Kelly, Valerie E. ;
Janke, Alexis A. ;
Shumway-Cook, Anne .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 207 (1-2) :65-73
[9]   Cell phones change the way we walk [J].
Lamberg, Eric M. ;
Muratori, Lisa M. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2012, 35 (04) :688-690
[10]   Practicing Safe Text: the Impact of Texting on Walking Behavior [J].
Lopresti-Goodman, Stacy M. ;
Rivera, Ana ;
Dressel, Christen .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) :644-648