Parallel observation of four methods for screening women under 25 years of age for genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis

被引:9
作者
Macmillan, S [1 ]
McKenzie, H
Templeton, A
机构
[1] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Dept Med Microbiol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2003年 / 107卷 / 01期
关键词
acceptability; Chlamydia trachomatis; EIA; LCR; vulval swabs;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00266-X
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare four methods of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in an obstetrics and gynaccology department. Study design: A total of 303 healthy women under 25 years were recruited from antenatal, induced abortion, and family planning clinics. Each underwent parallel testing of endocervical specimens by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and ligase chain reaction (LCR), vulval swabs by LCR, and urine by LCR. Outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, acceptability of each method, and the influence of pregnancy. Results: Overall prevalence (95% CI) was 9.9% (6.8-14%). All methods had a high rate of detection (75-100%), not affected by pregnancy. Urine was most acceptable, followed by vulval swabbing. Conclusions: Opportunistic screening of women under 25 years attending obstetric and gynaecology affiliated clinics found high rates of C. trachomatis infection. Both urine and vulval swab methods were highly sensitive, acceptable, and not affected by pregnancy status. Due to pragmatic issues surrounding the urine method, screening by vulval swabs deserves wider recognition. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[2]   Evaluation of self-taken samples for the presence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women using the ligase chain reaction assay [J].
Carder, C ;
Robinson, AJ ;
Broughton, C ;
Stephenson, JM ;
Ridgway, GL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 1999, 10 (12) :776-779
[3]   Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women [J].
Chernesky, MA ;
Jang, D ;
Sellors, J ;
Luinstra, K ;
Chong, S ;
Castriciano, S ;
Mahony, JB .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1997, 11 (04) :243-249
[4]   DIAGNOSIS OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS INFECTIONS IN MEN AND WOMEN BY TESTING FIRST-VOID URINE BY LIGASE CHAIN-REACTION [J].
CHERNESKY, MA ;
JANG, D ;
LEE, H ;
BURCZAK, JD ;
HU, H ;
SELLORS, J ;
TOMAZICALLEN, SJ ;
MAHONY, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (11) :2682-2685
[5]  
*CMO EXP ADV GROUP, 1998, CHLAM TRACH SUMM CON, P1
[6]   Use of ligase chain reaction with urine versus cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics [J].
Gaydos, CA ;
Howell, MR ;
Quinn, TC ;
Gaydos, JC ;
McKee, KT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (05) :1300-1304
[7]   Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: Cross sectional survey [J].
Grun, L ;
TassanoSmith, J ;
Carder, C ;
Johnson, AM ;
Robinson, A ;
Murray, E ;
Stephenson, J ;
Haines, A ;
Copas, A ;
Ridgway, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7102) :226-230
[8]   Chlamydia trachomatis detection and the menstrual cycle [J].
Horner, PJ ;
Crowley, T ;
Leece, J ;
Hughes, A ;
Smith, GD ;
Caul, EO .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9099) :341-342
[9]   Sensitivity of ligase chain reaction assay of urine from pregnant women for Chlamydia trachomatis [J].
Jensen, IP ;
Thorsen, P ;
Moller, BR .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9048) :329-330
[10]   DIAGNOSIS OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS GENITOURINARY INFECTION IN WOMEN BY LIGASE CHAIN-REACTION ASSAY OF URINE [J].
LEE, HH ;
CHERNESKY, MA ;
SCHACHTER, J ;
BURCZAK, JD ;
ANDREWS, WW ;
MULDOON, S ;
LECKIE, G ;
STAMM, WE .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8944) :213-216