Network Calculus-Based Latency for Time-Triggered Traffic under Flexible Window-Overlapping Scheduling (FWOS) in a Time-Sensitive Network (TSN)

被引:13
作者
Shalghum, Khaled M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Noordin, Nor Kamariah [1 ,3 ]
Sali, Aduwati [1 ,3 ]
Hashim, Fazirulhisyam [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Comp & Commun Engn, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Azzaytuna Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Tarhuna 00218, Libya
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Wireless & Photon Networks Res Ctr Excellence WiP, Serdang 40150, Malaysia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
mixed-criticality real-time systems; time-sensitive network (TSN); scheduling algorithm; worst-case latency performance; network calculus;
D O I
10.3390/app11093896
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Deterministic latency is an urgent demand to pursue the continuous increase in intelligence in several real-time applications, such as connected vehicles and automation industries. A time-sensitive network (TSN) is a new framework introduced to serve these applications. Several functions are defined in the TSN standard to support time-triggered (TT) requirements, such as IEEE 802.1Qbv and IEEE 802.1Qbu for traffic scheduling and preemption mechanisms, respectively. However, implementing strict timing constraints to support scheduled traffic can miss the needs of unscheduled real-time flows. Accordingly, more relaxed scheduling algorithms are required. In this paper, we introduce the flexible window-overlapping scheduling (FWOS) algorithm that optimizes the overlapping among TT windows by three different metrics: the priority of overlapping, the position of overlapping, and the overlapping ratio (OR). An analytical model for the worst-case end-to-end delay (WCD) is derived using the network calculus (NC) approach considering the relative relationships between window offsets for consecutive nodes and evaluated under a realistic vehicle use case. While guaranteeing latency deadline for TT traffic, the FWOS algorithm defines the maximum allowable OR that maximizes the bandwidth available for unscheduled transmission. Even under a non-overlapping scenario, less pessimistic latency bounds have been obtained using FWOS than the latest related works.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Ag T.C., 2014, P 2014 IEEE 19 INT W
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, P 24 INT C REAL TIM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IEEE Standard 802.15.4-2015, DOI [10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7786995, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7786995]
[4]   Routing and Scheduling of Time-Triggered Traffic in Time-Sensitive Networks [J].
Atallah, Ayman A. ;
Hamad, Ghaith Bany ;
Mohamed, Otmane Ait .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 16 (07) :4525-4534
[5]  
Chen C., 2020, P ICPS 20
[6]  
Ernst R., 2016, P DES AUT TEST EUR C
[7]  
Finn Norman, 2018, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, V2, P22, DOI 10.1109/MCOMSTD.2018.1700076
[8]   Worst-Case Timing Analysis of AFDX Networks With Multiple TSN/BLS Shapers [J].
Finzi, A. ;
Mifdaoui, A. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :106765-106784
[9]  
Finzi A, 2018, 2018 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FACTORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (WFCS 2018)
[10]  
Gautam N., 2020, P GLOBECOM 2020 2020