Risk indicators for marginal bone resorption around implants in function for at least 4 years: A retrospective longitudinal study

被引:19
|
作者
Mameno, Tomoaki [1 ]
Wada, Masahiro [1 ]
Otsuki, Motohiro [1 ]
Okuno, Ikuhisa [1 ]
Ozeki, Kenji [1 ]
Tahara, Akihiko [1 ]
Ikebe, Kazunori [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Prosthodont Gerodontol & Oral Rehabil, Grad Sch Dent, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
bone resorption; dental implants; epidemiology; longitudinal studies; risk factors; DENTAL IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; ORAL IMPLANTS; DISEASES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; METAANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; THERAPY; DENSITY; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1002/JPER.18-0756
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundMarginal bone stability is considered one of the most important issues in implant dentistry. It is essential to understand how various factors influence bone resorption around implants. The purpose of this retrospective longitudinal study was to identify potential risk indicators associated with marginal bone resorption around implants in function for at least 4 years. MethodsSeveral systemic-related, intraoral-related, implant-related factors were collected. Marginal bone level change (MBLC) was determined by comparing intraoral radiographs taken at baseline (1 year after prosthesis delivery), and at follow-up (over 3 years from baseline). A hierarchical regression analysis using liner mixed-effects models was performed to examine correlations between MBLC and various factors. ResultsOverall, 514 patients with 1535 implants were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 62.9 years. Mean annual MBLC was 0.048 mm, and mean functional time was 5.96 years. The result showed that the following explanatory variables had significant effects on MBLC: functional time, plaque control record > 20%, Eichner index C1-3, maxilla, cement-retained superstructure, and keratinized mucosa width < 2 mm. We did not find statistically significant associations between bone resorption and some variables known as risk factors, such as diabetes, smoking, and history of periodontitis. ConclusionsWithin the limits of this study, longer functional time, poor oral hygiene, loss of occlusal support, location in the maxilla, cement-retained superstructure, and less keratinized mucosa should be considered as risk indicators for bone resorption around implants.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors affecting radiographic marginal bone resorption at dental implants in function for at least 5 years: A multicenter retrospective study
    Trombelli, Leonardo
    Farina, Roberto
    Tomasi, Cristiano
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    Paolantoni, Guerino
    Giordano, Francesco
    Ortensi, Luca
    Simonelli, Anna
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (11) : 1406 - 1417
  • [2] Dental implants in diabetic patients: retrospective cohort study reporting on implant survival and risk indicators for excessive marginal bone loss at 5 years
    de Araujo Nobre, M.
    Malo, P.
    Goncalves, Y.
    Sabas, A.
    Salvado, F.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 43 (11) : 863 - 870
  • [3] Marginal bone level changes around dental implants with one or two adjacent teeth - A clinical and radiographic retrospective study with a follow up of at least 10 years
    Weigel, Lucienne D.
    Scherrer, Angelina
    Schmid, Lucas
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (08) : 872 - 880
  • [4] Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study
    Beretta, Mario
    Maiorana, Carlo
    Manfredini, Mattia
    Signorino, Fabrizio
    Poli, Pier Paolo
    Vinci, Raffaele
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2021, 20 (03): : 381 - 388
  • [5] Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study
    Mario Beretta
    Carlo Maiorana
    Mattia Manfredini
    Fabrizio Signorino
    Pier Paolo Poli
    Raffaele Vinci
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2021, 20 : 381 - 388
  • [6] The retrospective study of marginal bone loss around dental implants according to different autogenous bone grafts
    Kim, Tae-Yi
    Kim, Ye-Mi
    Kim, Ji-Youn
    Kim, Myung-Rae
    Kim, Sun-Jong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2011, 37 (06) : 483 - 489
  • [7] Marginal resorption and periimplant bone quality relation in a 3 and 5 years study with Branemark implants.
    Donado, A
    Peris, R
    Sada, JM
    Donado, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (05) : 1245 - 1245
  • [8] Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study
    Galindo-Moreno, P.
    Fernandez-Jimenez, A.
    Avila-Ortiz, G.
    Silvestre, F. J.
    Hernandez-Cortes, P.
    Wang, H. L.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (03) : 378 - 384
  • [9] Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around implants supporting splinted fixed bridges: A retrospective study on 412 implants
    Manfredini, Mattia
    Poli, Pier Paolo
    Beretta, Mario
    Rossi, Federico
    Rigoni, Marta
    Veronesi, Valentina
    Maiorana, Carlo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (05) : 547 - 559
  • [10] The Role of Timing of Loading on Later Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Mumcu, Emre
    Arat, Selda
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (05) : 363 - 376