Prediction of the mixed mode I/II fracture toughness of PMMA by an artificial intelligence approach

被引:23
作者
Wiangkham, Attasit [1 ]
Ariyarit, Atthaphon [2 ]
Aengchuan, Prasert [1 ]
机构
[1] Suranaree Univ Technol, Inst Engn, Sch Mfg Engn, Muang 30000, Nakhon Ratchasi, Thailand
[2] Suranaree Univ Technol, Inst Engn, Sch Mech Engn, Muang 30000, Nakhon Ratchasi, Thailand
关键词
Mixed mode I/II; Artificial intelligence; Fracture toughness;
D O I
10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102910
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence is playing an increasing role in materials testing, whether it is in a new material design, designing new testing methods, or creating a model to predict materials properties. In this research, the artificial intelligence was from an artificial neural network (ANN) and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), which was applied to predict mixed mode I/II fracture toughness of polymethyl methacrylate material (PMMA). The predictive modeling was based on the factors of thickness, width, crack length to width ratio of the specimen, and mode mixity angle. The training, validation, and testing process of the model used a total of 96 data points per factor. The efficiency of the ANN model in the modeling process, R-2, MSE and MAPE, was 0.9905, 0.0859, and 4.7911 for mode I fracture toughness and 0.9848, 0.0161 and 4.1994 for mode II fracture toughness. The efficiency of the ANFIS model in the modeling process, R-2, MSE and MAPE, for mode I fracture toughness was 0.9953, 0.0415, and 3.2601, while for mode II fracture toughness was 0.9894, 0.0112, and 3.0894. The model application is used to predict the fracture toughness at different levels of factors from the modeling process, with results showing that the fracture toughness from the prediction model is slightly different from the experimental values.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Comparison of fuzzy inference system (FIS), FIS with artificial neural networks (FIS plus ANN) and FIS with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (FIS plus ANFIS) for inventory control [J].
Aengchuan, Prasert ;
Phruksaphanrat, Busaba .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2018, 29 (04) :905-923
[2]   Experimental and theoretical fracture toughness investigation of PUR foams under mixed mode I plus III loading [J].
Aliha, M. R. M. ;
Linul, E. ;
Bahmani, A. ;
Marsavina, L. .
POLYMER TESTING, 2018, 67 :75-83
[3]  
Anderson TL, 2017, Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, V4th, DOI [10.1201/9781315370293, DOI 10.1201/9781315370293]
[4]   Effective 2D and 3D crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation [J].
Areias, P. ;
Reinoso, J. ;
Camanho, P. P. ;
Cesar de Sa, J. ;
Rabczuk, T. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2018, 189 :339-360
[5]   An Approach Combining an Efficient and Global Evolutionary Algorithm with a Gradient-Based Method for Airfoil Design Problems [J].
Ariyarit, Atthaphon ;
Kanazaki, Masahiro ;
Bureerat, Sujin .
SMART SCIENCE, 2020, 8 (01) :14-23
[6]  
ASTM, 2014, D5045 ASTM PA
[7]   Mixed mode brittle fracture in epoxy/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites [J].
Ayatollahi, M. R. ;
Shadlou, S. ;
Shokrieh, M. M. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2011, 78 (14) :2620-2632
[8]   Adaptive fourth-order phase field analysis using deep energy minimization [J].
Goswami, Somdatta ;
Anitescu, Cosmin ;
Rabczuk, Timon .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2020, 107
[9]   Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture [J].
Goswami, Somdatta ;
Anitescu, Cosmin ;
Chakraborty, Souvik ;
Rabczuk, Timon .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2020, 106
[10]  
Ham F.M., 2000, PRINCIPLES NEUROCOMP