Is the school context associated with instructional quality? The effects of social composition, leadership, teacher collaboration, and school climate

被引:27
作者
Holzberger, Doris [1 ]
Schiepe-Tiska, Anja [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Educ, Ctr Int Student Assessment, Munich, Germany
关键词
School context; school characteristics; instructional quality; principals; multilevel analysis;
D O I
10.1080/09243453.2021.1913190
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The relevance of the school context to creating a successful learning environment and promoting teachers' instructional quality is not yet clear. In the current study, we examine whether schools differ in aspects of instructional quality (i.e., classroom management and task feedback) and whether differences between schools can be explained by school characteristics (i.e., social composition, school's academic track, principals' leadership, teacher collaboration, and school climate). Therefore, we model instructional quality both at teacher and school level and include multiple perspectives on the school context. German Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 data were re-analyzed, resulting in data from 1,939 teachers and their principals in 198 schools. Multilevel analyses revealed that schools differ systematically in their instructional quality. These differences were related to social composition, principals' leadership, teacher collaboration, and school climate. Accordingly, schools have the potential to promote instructional quality. However, teachers' perceptions of school characteristics are more relevant than those of the principals.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 485
页数:21
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: reading, mathematics and science, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264305274-EN, 10.1787/b25-fab8-en, DOI 10.1787/B25-FAB8-EN]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2013, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264258341-EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, School factors related to quality and equity: Results from PISA 2000, DOI [DOI 10.1242/DEV.020867, 10.1787/9789264008199-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264008199-EN]
[4]  
[Anonymous], J STAT SOFTW, DOI DOI 10.18637/JSS.V033.I01.3,10
[5]  
Astor R. A., 2016, REV EDUC RES, V87, P425, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0034654316669821, 10.3102/0034654316669821]
[6]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI
[7]   Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress [J].
Baumert, Juergen ;
Kunter, Mareike ;
Blum, Werner ;
Brunner, Martin ;
Voss, Thamar ;
Jordan, Alexander ;
Klusmann, Uta ;
Krauss, Stefan ;
Neubrand, Michael ;
Tsai, Yi-Miau .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (01) :133-180
[8]  
Bell L., 2003, A systematic review of the impact of school headteachers and principals on student outcomes
[9]  
Betts JR, 2011, HBK ECON, V3, P341, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7218(11)03007-3
[10]   What Does It Mean to Be Ranked a "High" or "Low" Value-Added Teacher? Observing Differences in Instructional Quality Across Districts [J].
Blazar, David ;
Litke, Erica ;
Barmore, Johanna .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (02) :324-359