BRACHYTHERAPY FOR STAGE IIIB SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX: SURVIVAL AND TOXICITY

被引:6
作者
Zuliani, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
Cunha, Maercio de Oliveira [1 ]
Esteves, Sergio C. B. [1 ]
Teixeira, Julio Cesar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Tocoginecol, Secao Radioterapia, Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA | 2010年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
Uterine cervical neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Brachytherapy; Cisplatin; HIGH-DOSE-RATE; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM; RTOG;
D O I
10.1590/S0104-42302010000100013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. To compare survival and toxicity of three different treatments for stage IIIB cervix cancer: low-dose-rate (LDR), high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and association of HDR and chemotherapy. METHODS. Between 1985 and 2005, 230 patients with FIGO stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix received 4-field pelvic teletherapy at doses between 40 and 50.4 Gy, with a different complementation in each group. The LDRB group, with 42 patients, received one or two insertions of LDR, with Cesium-137, in a total dose of 80 to 100Gy at point A. The HDR group, 155 patients received HDR in 4 weekly 7 Gy fractions and 9 Gy to 14.4 Gy applied to the involved parametria. The CHT group, 33 patients, were given the same treatment as the HDR group and received 5 or 6 weekly cycles of cisplatin, 40 mg per m2. RESULTS. The five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 60% for the HDR group and 45% for the LDR group, and the two-year PFS for the CHT group was 65% (p = 0.02). The five-year Overall Survival (OS) was 65% for the HDR group and 49% for the LDR group. The two-year OS was 86% for the CHT group (p = 0.02). Rectum toxicity grade 11 was 7% for the LDR group, 4% for the HDR group and 7% for the CHT group that had one case of rectum toxicity grade IV. CONCLUSION. Patients that received HDR had better OS and PFS. The Chemotherapy-HDR association showed no benefit when compared to HDR only. Toxicity rates showed no difference between the three groups.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 40
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Aisen S, 1992, Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, V47, P121
[2]  
[Anonymous], NCI CLIN ANN
[3]  
ARAI T, 1992, CANCER, V69, P175, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920101)69:1<175::AID-CNCR2820690129>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-B
[5]  
Benedet JL, 2000, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V70, P209
[6]   TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) [J].
COX, JD ;
STETZ, J ;
PAJAK, TF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1341-1346
[7]   Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01 [J].
Eifel, PJ ;
Winter, K ;
Morris, M ;
Levenback, C ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Cooper, J ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, D ;
Mutch, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) :872-880
[8]  
Esteves Sérgio Carlos Barros, 2004, Radiol Bras, V37, P337
[9]   Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer retrospective analysis of two sequential series [J].
Ferrigno, R ;
Nishimoto, IN ;
Novaes, PERD ;
Pellizzon, ACA ;
Maia, MAC ;
Fogarolli, RC ;
Salvajoli, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (04) :1108-1116
[10]  
*I NAC CANC BRAS M, 2007, COORD PREV VIG