Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results

被引:14
作者
Wang, Bo [1 ]
Ding, Wei [1 ]
Sun, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoling [1 ]
Xu, Liming [1 ]
Teng, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pathol, Qingchun Rd 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
AMERICAN SOCIETY; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY/COLLEGE; FISH; HETEROGENEITY; TRASTUZUMAB; EXPERIENCE; UTILITY; GENES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-53003-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) recently issued updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in invasive breast cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the new recommendations on HER2 FISH interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically (IHC) equivocal results. 1810 breast cancer cases with IHC equivocal results were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and May 2019. Concomitant IHC was performed on the same tissue blocks detected by FISH testing. According to the 2018 guidelines, all the cases in ISH group 2 were categorized as HER2 negative; three of four cases in ISH group 3 were considered as HER2 positive, while the one scored IHC 1+ was reclassified as HER2 negative; Fifty-three previously ISH equivocal cases were redistributed into ten HER2-positive cases and forty-three HER2-negative cases. In conclusion, the utility of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines resulted in a slight decrease in HER2 positive rate, due to the reclassification of cases in ISH group 2 and group 4. The implementation of the new guidelines can reduce reflex FISH test and make the diagnosis of HER2 gene status more definitive.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer
    Guo, Lei
    Yuan, Pei
    Zhang, Jing
    Ling, Yun
    Li, Wenbin
    Zhao, Bohui
    Ying, Jianming
    Xuan, Lixue
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 166 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [32] Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers
    Kamaljeet Singh
    Umadevi Tantravahi
    Michele M. Lomme
    Terese Pasquariello
    Margaret Steinhoff
    C. James Sung
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 157 : 405 - 411
  • [33] Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+by immunohistochemistry
    Taylor, Valerie J.
    Barnes, Penny J.
    Godwin, Sean C.
    Bethune, Gillian C.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2021, 479 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [34] Impact of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER-2 reporting categories of IHC and reflex FISH in breast cancer
    Pasricha, Sunil
    Menon, Vidya
    Gupta, Gurudutt
    Kamboj, Meenakshi
    Sharma, Anila
    Durga, Garima
    Tripathi, Rupal
    Batra, Ullas
    Jajodia, Ankush
    Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu
    Agrawal, Chaturbhuj
    Doval, Dinesh C.
    Mehta, Anurag
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (11) : 2213 - 2216
  • [35] Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 reporting guidelines in breast cancer: An assessment study from Indian oncology centre that primarily performs HER2 IHC testing with special emphasis on IHC equivocal category
    Pasricha, Sunil
    Gupta, Gurudutt
    Garg, Ritu
    Sharma, Anila
    Gandhi, Jatin S.
    Durga, Garima
    Kamboj, Meenakshi
    Grover, Shrruti
    Mehta, Anurag
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (04) : 468 - 472
  • [36] Institutional quality assurance for breast cancer HER2 immunohistochemicat testing: identification of outlier results and impact of simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization cotesting
    Green, Ian F.
    Zynger, Debra L.
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 46 (12) : 1842 - 1849
  • [37] Effect of the 2013 ASCO-CAP HER2 Testing Guideline on the Management of IHC/HER2 2+Invasive Breast Cancer
    Yamada, Mai
    Kubo, Makoto
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Yamashita, Nami
    Kai, Masaya
    Zaguirre, Karen
    Kaneshiro, Kazuhisa
    Shimazaki, Akiko
    Hayashi, Saori
    Kawaji, Hitomi
    Mori, Masaki
    Oda, Yoshinao
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (08) : 4143 - 4149
  • [38] HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization discordances in invasive breast carcinoma with micropapillary features
    Stewart, Rachel L.
    Caron, Justin E.
    Gulbahce, Evin H.
    Factor, Rachel E.
    Geiersbach, Katherine B.
    Downs-Kelly, Erinn
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 (11) : 1561 - 1566
  • [39] Reappraisal of HER2 Amplification in High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Based on 2018 ASCO/CAP Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Mohanty, Sambit K.
    Mishra, Sourav K.
    Tiwari, Ankit
    Sharma, Shivani
    Bhardwaj, Mohit
    Pattnaik, Niharika
    Jaiswal, Sunil
    Baisakh, Manas R.
    Das, Subodh
    Pradhan, Manas R.
    Swain, Tapas R.
    Satpathy, Kaliprasad
    Williamson, Sean R.
    Parwani, Anil, V
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 (06) : 1130 - 1141
  • [40] Concordance of HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using Tissue Microarray in Breast Cancer
    Furrer, Daniela
    Jacob, Simon
    Caron, Chantal
    Sanschagrin, Francois
    Provencher, Louise
    Diorio, Caroline
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (06) : 3323 - 3329