Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results

被引:14
|
作者
Wang, Bo [1 ]
Ding, Wei [1 ]
Sun, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoling [1 ]
Xu, Liming [1 ]
Teng, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pathol, Qingchun Rd 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
AMERICAN SOCIETY; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY/COLLEGE; FISH; HETEROGENEITY; TRASTUZUMAB; EXPERIENCE; UTILITY; GENES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-53003-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) recently issued updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in invasive breast cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the new recommendations on HER2 FISH interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically (IHC) equivocal results. 1810 breast cancer cases with IHC equivocal results were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and May 2019. Concomitant IHC was performed on the same tissue blocks detected by FISH testing. According to the 2018 guidelines, all the cases in ISH group 2 were categorized as HER2 negative; three of four cases in ISH group 3 were considered as HER2 positive, while the one scored IHC 1+ was reclassified as HER2 negative; Fifty-three previously ISH equivocal cases were redistributed into ten HER2-positive cases and forty-three HER2-negative cases. In conclusion, the utility of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines resulted in a slight decrease in HER2 positive rate, due to the reclassification of cases in ISH group 2 and group 4. The implementation of the new guidelines can reduce reflex FISH test and make the diagnosis of HER2 gene status more definitive.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines
    Nagarjun, B. R.
    Parikh, Biren
    Patel, Manaswi Nareshkumar
    Trivedi, Pina J.
    Patel, Dharmesh M.
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 11 (04) : 281 - 286
  • [2] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines update for HER2 testing by FISH in breast cancer
    Xu, Bin
    Shen, Jianguo
    Guo, Wenhao
    Zhao, Wenhe
    Zhuang, Yiyu
    Wang, Linbo
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [3] HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines
    McLemore, Lauren E.
    Albarracin, Constance T.
    Gruschkus, Stephen K.
    Bassett, Roland L., Jr.
    Wu, Yun
    Dhamne, Sagar
    Yiml, Isaiah
    Lin, Kevin
    Bedrosian, Isabelle
    Sneigel, Nour
    Chen, Hui
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 187 (01) : 95 - 104
  • [4] What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+cases?
    Curado, Monica
    Caramelo, Ana Sofia
    Eloy, Catarina
    Polonia, Antonio
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2019, 475 (03) : 303 - 311
  • [5] Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 revised guidelines on HER2 results in breast core biopsies with invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective study
    Overcast, Wynton B.
    Zhang, Jianying
    Zynger, Debra L.
    Tozbikian, Gary H.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [6] The differences of clinicopathologic characteristics among subgroups of reclassified HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) according to the ASCO/CAP 2018 breast cancer HER2 testing guidelines
    Yang, Libo
    Chen, Min
    Pu, Tianjie
    Wu, Shuang
    Wei, Bing
    Yang, Jieliang
    Bu, Hong
    Zhang, Zhang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (05) : 283 - 290
  • [7] HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline
    Fan, Yao-Shan
    Casas, Carmen E.
    Peng, Jinghong
    Watkins, Melanie
    Fan, Lynn
    Chapman, Jennifer
    Ikpatt, Offiong Francis
    Gomez, Carmen
    Zhao, Wei
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 155 (03) : 457 - 462
  • [8] HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines
    Lauren E. McLemore
    Constance T. Albarracin
    Stephen K. Gruschkus
    Roland L. Bassett
    Yun Wu
    Sagar Dhamne
    Isaiah Yim
    Kevin Lin
    Isabelle Bedrosian
    Nour Sneige
    Hui Chen
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 187 : 95 - 104
  • [9] Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines
    Xu, Fang-Ping
    Wang, Kun
    Xu, Jie
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Yi-Fang
    Wu, Hong-Mei
    Zhang, Ming-Hui
    Long, Xiao-Xu
    Luo, Xin-Lan
    Zhang, Ke-Ping
    Lin, Dan-Yi
    Liu, Yan-Hui
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 166 (03) : 757 - 764
  • [10] The impact of 2018 ASCO-CAP HER2 testing guidelines on breast cancer HER2 results. An audit of 2132 consecutive cases evaluated by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
    Farshid, Gelareh
    Dhatrak, Deepak
    Gilhotra, Amardeep
    Koszyca, Barbara
    Nolan, James
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (09) : 1783 - 1790