To ban or not to ban carbon-intensive materials: A legal and administrative assessment of product carbon requirements

被引:8
作者
Gerres, Timo [1 ]
Haussner, Manuel [2 ]
Neuhoff, Karsten [3 ,4 ]
Pirlot, Alice [5 ]
机构
[1] Comillas Pontifical Univ, Inst Res Technol, ICAI, Madrid, Spain
[2] FAU Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Tax Law & Publ Law, Erlangen, Germany
[3] German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, Climate Policy Dept, Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Econ & Law, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Oxford, Ctr Business Taxat, Said Business Sch, Oxford, England
关键词
TRADE LAW; INDUSTRY; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/reel.12395
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
By setting near-zero-emission requirements for the production of certain products to be sold on the European single market (product carbon requirements, PCRs), the European Union could accelerate the phase-out of carbon-intensive production processes. The announcement of such requirements would send a signal to producers, financing institutions and other relevant stakeholders, thus incentivizing them to prepare for the shift to a carbon-neutral society. This article analyses several European environmental standards and technical regulations to offer insights into the political, legal and technical background for the adoption of PCRs. It shows that PCRs would constitute a new development in technical regulations. Given the relevance of World Trade Organization law for the adoption of standards and technical regulations on products, the article analyses in further detail the compatibility of PCRs under WTO law, and argues that PCRs can be designed in line with the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 262
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Alcaraz Isabel Cristina Salinas, 2015, RIV VIRTUAL VIA INVE, V10, P77
[2]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Renewables 2020 - Analysis and Forecast to 2025
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Buying green! A handbook on green public procurement, V3rd
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, WTDS231ABR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CARBON CLIMATE LAW R
[7]   Sustainability economics: Where do we stand? [J].
Ayres, Robert U. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 67 (02) :281-310
[8]   A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement [J].
Bataille, Chris ;
Ahman, Max ;
Neuhoff, Karsten ;
Nilsson, Lars J. ;
Fischedick, Manfred ;
Lechtenboehmer, Stefan ;
Solano-Rodriquez, Baltazar ;
Denis-Ryan, Amandine ;
Stiebert, Seton ;
Waisman, Henri ;
Sartor, Oliver ;
Rahbar, Shahrzad .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 187 :960-973
[9]  
Bhala R, 1998, WORLD TRADE LAW GATT, P127
[10]   Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market [J].
Calel, Raphael ;
Dechezlepretre, Antoine .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 98 (01) :173-191