Do feed-in tariffs drive PV cost or viceversa?

被引:31
作者
Antonelli, Marco [1 ]
Desideri, Umberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Ingn Energia Sistemi Terr & Costruz, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dipartimento Ingn, I-06125 Perugia, Italy
关键词
Photovoltaic energy; Feed in tariff; Energy policy; Renewable energy systems; Financing sustainable energy systems; Incentivization of RES; PHOTOVOLTAIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRICAL ENERGY; SYSTEMS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.059
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A survey of the PV market in Italy was done studying a number of installations of different sizes whose economic data were known and assessed. The Italian market has experienced a boom in the PV market after the first mechanism of feed-in tariffs was promoted in 2005. The variations of the tariff structure in the following years have caused significant changes in the market structure in terms of average size and technical characteristics of installed plants. However, an Italian PV industry was not stimulated by the incentives and only companies involved in installation and maintenance were created. At the same time, the cost of the PV plants components, design and commissioning have followed quite a particular trend, which is more determined by the tariffs than by the market development and structure. It is quite clear that the costs of PV plants component are not driven by the amount of installations but by the tariffs, with a trend that follows the decreases in the incentives and not the global installed power. It is therefore very important to study the right tariff mechanisms and benefits to avoid financial disturbances on the market and to promote a real competitive market instead of a simple financial operation under a fake facade of green economy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 729
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012 IEEE POW EN SOC
[2]   The doping effect of Italian feed-in tariffs on the PV market [J].
Antonelli, Marco ;
Desideri, Umberto .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 :583-594
[3]   Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and Wind systems: Four representative European cases [J].
Campoccia, A. ;
Dusonchet, L. ;
Telaretti, E. ;
Zizzo, G. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2009, 83 (03) :287-297
[4]   Importance of policy for energy system transformation: Diffusion of PV technology in Japan and Germany [J].
Chowdhury, Sanjeeda ;
Sumita, Ushio ;
Islam, Ashraful ;
Bedja, Idriss .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :285-293
[5]   Feasibility study of developing photovoltaic power projects in Italy: An integrated approach [J].
Cucchiella, Federica ;
D'Adamo, Idiano .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (03) :1562-1576
[6]   Economic analysis of different supporting policies for the production of electrical energy by solar photovoltaics in western European Union countries [J].
Dusonchet, Luigi ;
Telaretti, Enrico .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3297-3308
[7]   Germany's solar cell promotion: Dark clouds on the horizon [J].
Frondel, Manuel ;
Ritter, Nolan ;
Schmidt, Christoph M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (11) :4198-4204
[8]  
Jacobs D, 2012, COMPREHENSIVE RENEWABLE ENERGY, VOL 1: PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR ENERGY, P73, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-087872-0.00104-9
[9]   Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries [J].
Jenner, Steffen ;
Groba, Felix ;
Indvik, Joe .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 :385-401
[10]   Internalizing land use impacts for life cycle cost analysis of energy systems: A case of California's photovoltaic implementation [J].
Lakhani, Raksha ;
Doluweera, Ganesh ;
Bergerson, Joule .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 :253-259