Strategic responses to new technologies and their impact on firm performance

被引:223
作者
Lee, RP [1 ]
Grewal, R
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Coll Business, Las Vegas, NV 89557 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.68.4.157.42730
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Modern corporations must adopt and assimilate new technologies to build and sustain competitive advantage. The authors develop a theoretical framework to understand the relationships among (1) strategic responses to new technologies, (2) organizational resources, and (3) firm performance. Specifically, they theorize that a strategic response can be categorized according to the dimensions of magnitude, domain, and speed, and they conceptualize organizational resources as tangible and intangible. The authors operationalize this framework for the adoption of the Internet by traditional store-based retailers, for which they posit strategic responses as the speed of (1) adopting the Internet as a communications channel, (2) adopting the Internet as a sales channel, and (3) forming e-alliances. In addition, they use resource slack to represent organizational resources. Results from nine years (1992-2000) of data on 106 firms establish the influence of strategic responses on firm performance (i.e., market valuation of the firm, operationalized as Tobin's q). Specifically, the results show that both the adoption of the Internet as a communications channel and e-alliance formation positively influence firm performance. The positive effect of communications channel adoption on firm performance is enhanced further by the use of slack resources. Post hoc analysis reveals that the adoption of the Internet as a sales channel seems to matter only to firms that have preexisting catalog operations.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 171
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[61]   Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers [J].
Shankar, V ;
Carpenter, GS ;
Krishnamurthi, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (01) :54-70
[62]   THE MEASUREMENT AND DETERMINANTS OF BRAND EQUITY - A FINANCIAL APPROACH [J].
SIMON, CJ ;
SULLIVAN, MW .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (01) :28-52
[63]  
SINGH JV, 1986, ACAD MANAGE J, V29, P562, DOI 10.5465/256224
[64]   MARKET-INFORMATION PROCESSING AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING [J].
SINKULA, JM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1994, 58 (01) :35-45
[65]   An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes [J].
Sivadas, E ;
Dwyer, FR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2000, 64 (01) :31-49
[66]   HISTORICAL METHOD IN CONSUMER RESEARCH - DEVELOPING CAUSAL EXPLANATIONS OF CHANGE [J].
SMITH, RA ;
LUX, DS .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1993, 19 (04) :595-610
[67]   THE LEARNING-CURVE AND COMPETITION [J].
SPENCE, AM .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1981, 12 (01) :49-70
[68]   Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis [J].
Srivastava, RK ;
Shervani, TA ;
Fahey, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1998, 62 (01) :2-18
[69]   Marketing, business processes, and shareholder value: An organizationally embedded view of marketing activities and the discipline of marketing [J].
Srivastava, RK ;
Shervani, TA ;
Fahey, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1999, 63 :168-179
[70]  
Tanzer Andrew, 1990, FORBES, V145, P148