A 20-Year Review of 75 Cases of Salivary Duct Carcinoma

被引:114
作者
Gilbert, Mark R. [1 ]
Sharma, Arun [2 ]
Schmitt, Nicole C. [3 ]
Johnson, Jonas T. [1 ]
Ferris, Robert L. [1 ]
Duvvuri, Umamaheswar [1 ]
Kim, Seungwon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 200 Lothrop St,Ste 519, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] So Illinois Univ, Dept Surg, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Springfield, IL USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; GLAND; SURVIVAL; C-ERBB-2; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3930
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Salivary duct carcinoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy of the salivary glands. Owing to its rare nature, clinical data are limited, and only a few clinical studies comprise more than 50 patients. OBJECTIVE To review the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's experience with salivary duct carcinoma over a 20-year period, focusing on demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This investigation was a retrospective cohort study in a multihospital institution with tertiary referral. A pathology database was reviewed for all cases of histopathologically diagnosed salivary duct carcinoma from January 1, 1995, to October 20, 2014. Patients who were referrals for pathology review only and were never seen at the institution were excluded. In total, 75 study patients were identified. The electronic medical record was reviewed for details regarding demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcome, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). This study was supplemented with a review of the institution's Head and Neck Oncology Database for further clinical details. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measures consisted of OS and DFS. RESULTS The study sample comprised 75 participants with a mean age at diagnosis of 66.0 years (age range, 33-93 years), and 29% (n = 22) were female. Most primary tumors were from the parotid gland (83%), with the next most frequent site being the submandibular gland (12%). Overall, 41% of the cases were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Rates of other histologic features included the following: perineural invasion (69%), extracapsular spread (58%), ERBB2 (formerly HER2) positivity (31%) (62% of those who were tested), and vascular invasion (61%). The median OS was 3.1 years, and the median DFS was 2.7 years. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that facial nerve sacrifice and extracapsular spread were associated with lower OS (2.38 vs 5.11 years and 2.29 vs 6.56 years, respectively) and DFS (2.4 vs 3.88 years and 1.44 vs 4.5 years, respectively). Although underpowered, multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly worse OS in patients with N2 and N3 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 8.42, 95% CI, 1.84-38.5) but did not show significantly worse DFS or OS for facial nerve sacrifice or extracapsular spread. There was no association between ERBB2 positivity and survival and no difference in survival between patients receiving radiation therapy vs radiation therapy plus chemotherapy. No patients had recurrence or distant metastasis after 5 disease-free years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Salivary duct carcinoma is an aggressive disease. A large number of cases in this review were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and had classic negative prognostic indicators, such as perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and extracapsular spread. ERBB2 positivity was not associated with any difference in survival. Facial nerve involvement appears to indicate worse prognosis, as does nodal stage higher than N1. Recurrence and metastasis after 5 years are rare.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 495
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Prognostic significance of biomarkers (c-erbB-2, p53, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and DNA content) in salivary duct carcinoma [J].
Felix, A ;
ElNaggar, AK ;
Press, MF ;
Ordonez, NG ;
Fonseca, I ;
Tucker, SL ;
Luna, MA ;
Batsakis, JG .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1996, 27 (06) :561-566
[2]  
Guzzo M, 1997, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V19, P126, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199703)19:2<126::AID-HED7>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-6
[4]   Prognostic factors and outcome analysis of salivary duct carcinoma [J].
Han, Myung Woul ;
Roh, Jong-Lyel ;
Choi, Seung-Ho ;
Nam, Soon Yuhl ;
Lee, Hee Jin ;
Cho, Kyung-Ja ;
Lee, Sang-Wook ;
Kim, Sang Yoon .
AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2015, 42 (06) :472-477
[5]   Salivary duct carcinoma [J].
Hosal, AS ;
Fan, CY ;
Barnes, L ;
Myers, EN .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (06) :720-725
[6]   Clinical and immunohistologic typing of salivary duct carcinoma -: A report of 50 cases [J].
Jaehne, M ;
Roeser, K ;
Jaekel, T ;
Schepers, JD ;
Albert, N ;
Löning, T .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (12) :2526-2533
[7]   Survival rates and prognostic factors for infiltrating salivary duct carcinoma: Analysis of 228 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database [J].
Jayaprakash, Vijayvel ;
Merzianu, Mihai ;
Warren, Graham W. ;
Arshad, Hassan ;
Hicks, Wesley L., Jr. ;
Rigual, Nestor R. ;
Sullivan, Maureen A. ;
Seshadri, Mukund ;
Marshall, James R. ;
Cohan, David M. ;
Zhao, Yujie ;
Singh, Anurag K. .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (05) :694-701
[8]  
Johnston ML, 2015, HEAD NECK
[9]  
Kleinsasser O, 1968, Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd, V192, P100, DOI 10.1007/BF00301495
[10]   Low-Grade Salivary Duct Carcinoma or Low-Grade Intraductal Carcinoma? Review of the Literature [J].
Kuo Y.-J. ;
Weinreb I. ;
Perez-Ordonez B. .
Head and Neck Pathology, 2013, 7 (Suppl 1) :59-67