Masseteric nerve for gracilis muscle re-innervation in unilateral facial palsy: Impact on quality of life

被引:16
作者
Bianchi, B. [1 ]
Ferri, A. [1 ]
Poddi, V. [1 ]
Bergonzani, M. [1 ]
Pedrazzi, G. [2 ]
Ferrari, S. [1 ]
Sesenna, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Parma, Head & Neck Dept, Maxillofacial Surg Div, Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Parma, Dept Neurosci, Parma, Italy
关键词
Facial palsy; Masseteric nerve; Facial animation; Gracilis transplant; MOBIUS-SYNDROME; DISABILITY INDEX; PARALYZED FACE; REANIMATION; SMILE; TRANSPLANT; GRAFT; ANIMATION; PATIENT; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2017.03.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Unilateral established or congenital facial palsies are usually treated with neuromuscular transplantation to reanimate the impaired side of the face. One of the most debated points is the motor nerve to choose for the reinnervation of the transplant. Contra-lateral healthy facial nerve is usually preferred, but in selected cases motor nerve to masseter is considered a valuable option. However only a few clinical studies focused on quality of life in this subset of patients are available in literature. Methods: Twenty patients treated for established or congenital unilateral facial palsy reanimated with gracilis muscle transplant reinnervated with masseteric nerve were retrospectively analyzed. The FDI questionnaire on quality of life was administered before and after surgery and statistical analysis of results was conducted to score changes. Results: Overall results of the questionnaire resulted in a statistically significant improvement after surgery, with a p value of 0.05. Conclusion: Facial animation with gracilis muscle transplant re-innervated with masseteric nerve is a safe and reliable procedure in selected unilateral facial palsy patients. Results reported here confirm that surgery mainly improves the functional aspects of a patient's daily life quality, while the impact on social interactions and self-perception is less significant. The comparison of these results with those obtained in patients treated with gracilis muscle transplant re-innervated via contralateral facial nerve suggests that spontaneity is probably highly relevant to improve social aspects of QOL in this subset of patients. (C) 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1057
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The masseteric nerve: a versatile power source in facial animation techniques [J].
Bianchi, B. ;
Ferri, A. ;
Ferrari, S. ;
Copelli, C. ;
Salvagni, L. ;
Sesenna, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 52 (03) :264-269
[2]   Successful salvage surgery after treatment failures with cross graft and free muscle transplant in facial reanimation [J].
Bianchi, B. ;
Copelli, C. ;
Ferrari, S. ;
Ferri, A. ;
Sesenna, E. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 40 (02) :185-189
[3]   Facial animation with gracilis muscle transplant reinnervated via cross-face graft: Does it change patients' quality of life? [J].
Bianchi, Bernardo ;
Ferri, Andrea ;
Poddi, Valentina ;
Varazzani, Andrea ;
Ferrari, Silvano ;
Pedrazzi, Giuseppe ;
Sesenna, Enrico .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (08) :934-939
[4]   Facial reanimation after nerve sacrifice in the treatment of head and neck cancer [J].
Bianchi, Bernardo ;
Ferri, Andrea ;
Sesenna, Enrico .
CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 20 (02) :114-119
[5]   Nerve sources for facial reanimation with muscle transplant in patients with unilateral facial palsy - Clinical analysis of 3 techniques [J].
Faria, Jose Carlos M. ;
Scopel, Gean P. ;
Busnardo, Fabio F. ;
Ferreira, Marcus C. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 59 (01) :87-91
[6]   Three-Dimensional Video Analysis of the Paralyzed Face Reanimated by Cross-Face Nerve Grafting and Free Gracilis Muscle Transplantation: Quantification of the Functional Outcome [J].
Frey, Manfred ;
Michaelidou, Maria ;
Tzou, Chieh-Han John ;
Pona, Igor ;
Mittlboeck, Martina ;
Gerber, Hans ;
Stuessi, Edgar .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) :1709-1722
[7]  
Hadlock TA, 2011, ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, V13, P190, DOI 10.1001/archfacial.2011.29
[8]   Measuring Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction in Facial Paralysis Patients: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures [J].
Ho, Adelyn L. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Van Laeken, Nancy .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (01) :91-99
[9]   Facial Reanimation with Gracilis Muscle Transfer Neurotized to Cross-Facial Nerve Graft versus Masseteric Nerve: A Comparative Study Using the FACIAL CLIMA Evaluating System [J].
Hontanilla, Bernardo ;
Marre, Diego ;
Cabello, Alvaro .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (06) :1241-1252
[10]   Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: The FaCE Scale [J].
Kahn, JB ;
Gliklich, RE ;
Boyev, KP ;
Stewart, MG ;
Metson, RB ;
McKenna, MJ .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (03) :387-398