The effect of positive psychotherapy education on subjective wellbeing among nursing students

被引:8
作者
Gulec Keskin, Serap [1 ]
Gulirmak, Kubra [1 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Psychiat Nursing, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
balance model; nursing; positive psychotherapy; spirituality; subjective well-being; SELF-EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/ppc.12865
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose This study was conducted to determine the effect of psychoeducation of the positive psychotherapy (PPT)-based balance model applied to university students on spirituality index levels of their subjective well-being. Design and Method The research was conducted as a quasi-experimental study with a one-group pretest-posttest design. The population of this study was composed of undergraduate students of a university and the sample was composed of the students taking Intern Practice Course of Psychiatric Nursing. In the study, the data were collected using a Personal Information Form and Spirituality Index of Well-being. Findings Frequency, percentage, Shapiro-Wilk test, and Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks tests were used to assess the data of the study. As a result of the statistical analysis, the students obtained significant results in the total score of Spirituality Index of Well-Being and the subscales of "Self-Efficacy" and "Life Schemes" (p < 0.05). Conclusion PPT-based balance model education increases the subjective well-being levels of the students significantly. Practice Implications PPT has a positive effect on the subjective well-being levels of individuals with spirituality index, this method should be used more in clinical studies with healthy or sick people.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 870
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Abbasi Mojgan, 2014, Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, V19, P242
[2]  
Arnedo CO., 2015, Positive Psychotherapy in Cancer: Facilitating Posttraumatic Growth in Assimilation and Accommodation of Traumatic Experience. Comprehensive Guide to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
[3]  
Arseven A., 2016, Electronic Turkish Studies, V11, P63, DOI [10.7827/TurkishStudies.10001, DOI 10.7827/TURKISHSTUDIES.10001]
[4]  
Aydin M., 2019, The Journal of Social Science, V3, P439, DOI [10.30520/tjsosci.571198, DOI 10.30520/TISOSCI.571198, DOI 10.30520/TJSOSCI.571198]
[5]   Collective efficacy and natural hazards: differing roles of social cohesion and task-specific efficacy in shaping risk and coping beliefs [J].
Babcicky, Philipp ;
Seebauer, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (06) :695-712
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[7]  
Boztilki Melike - Ardic Elif., 2017, Journal of Academic Research in Nursing, V3/Ek sayi, P39, DOI DOI 10.5222/JAREN.2017.1008
[8]  
Calkins H, 2017, J ARRYTHM, V33, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001
[9]  
Colakoglu, 2016, J SOC HUMAN SC RES, V87, P70
[10]  
Demir R., 2020, Humanistic Perspective, V2, P108