Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Storage Systems within the Italian Electric Network

被引:34
作者
Carvalho, Maria Leonor [1 ]
Temporelli, Andrea [1 ]
Girardi, Pierpaolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ric Sistema Energet RSE SpA, Via R Rubattino 54, I-20134 Milan, Italy
关键词
lithium-ion batteries; stationary storage; life cycle assessment; environmental impact; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ANALYSIS; LEAD-ACID-BATTERIES; LITHIUM-ION;
D O I
10.3390/en14082047
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The introduction of stationary storage systems into the Italian electric network is necessary to accommodate the increasing share of energy from non-programmable renewable sources and to reach progressive decarbonization targets. In this framework, a life cycle assessment is a suitable tool to assess environmental impacts during the entire life cycle of stationary storage systems, i.e., their sustainability. A Li-ion battery (lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP), nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) 532, and NMC 622) entire life cycle assessment (LCA) based on primary and literature data was performed. The LCA results showed that energy consumption (predominantly during cell production), battery design (particularly binder choice), inventory accuracy, and data quality are key aspects that can strongly affect results. Regarding the battery construction phase, LFP batteries showed better performance than the NMC ones, but when the end-of-life (EoL) stage was included, NMC cell performance became very close to those of LFPs. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses, done using the Monte Carlo methodology, confirmed that the results (except for the freshwater eutrophication indicator) were characterized by a low dispersion and that the energy mix choice, during the different battery life phases, was able to greatly influence the overall impact. The use of primary and updated data related to battery cell production, like those used in the present paper, was necessary to obtain reliable results, and the application to a European production line is an item of novelty of this paper.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Research gaps in environmental life cycle assessments of lithium ion batteries for grid-scale stationary energy storage systems: End-of-life options and other issues [J].
Pellow, Matthew A. ;
Ambrose, Hanjiro ;
Mulvaney, Dustin ;
Betita, Rick ;
Shaw, Stephanie .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 23
[22]   Environmental assessment of vanadium redox and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage [J].
Rydh, CJ .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 1999, 80 (1-2) :21-29
[23]   Life-cycle analysis of flow-assisted nickel zinc-, manganese dioxide-, and valve-regulated lead-acid batteries designed for demand-charge reduction [J].
Spanos, Constantine ;
Turney, Damon E. ;
Fthenakis, Vasilis .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 43 :478-494
[24]   The ecoinvent database version 3 (part II): analyzing LCA results and comparison to version 2 [J].
Steubing, Bernhard ;
Wernet, Gregor ;
Reinhard, Jurgen ;
Bauer, Christian ;
Moreno-Ruiz, Emilia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (09) :1269-1281
[25]   Status of life cycle inventories for batteries [J].
Sullivan, J. L. ;
Gaines, L. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 58 :134-148
[26]  
Sullivan J.L, 2010, A Review of Battery Life-Cycle Analysis: State of Knowledge and Critical Needs, DOI DOI 10.2172/1000659
[27]  
Sun K., 2011, P 30 CHIN CONTR C YA
[28]  
Temporelli A., 2019, ANALISI LETTERATURA
[29]   Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicle Batteries: An Overview of Recent Literature [J].
Temporelli, Andrea ;
Carvalho, Maria Leonor ;
Girardi, Pierpaolo .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)
[30]  
Tremblay O., 2009, WORLD ELECTR VEHIC J, V3, P289, DOI 10.3390/wevj3020289