Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix

被引:28
作者
Yogev, Y [1 ]
Ben-Haroush, A
Lahav, E
Horowitz, E
Hod, M
Kaplan, B
机构
[1] Rabin Med Ctr, Perinatal Div, IL-49100 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Rabin Med Ctr, WHO, Ctr Collaborat, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-49100 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Cesarean section; labor induction; prostaglandin E-2;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.02.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the pregnancy outcome of induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 (PGE(2)) in women with one previous lower segment cesarean section. Methods: A retrospective cohort design was used. The study sample included 1028 consecutive women with one previous cesarean section, of whom 97 underwent induction of labor (study group) and 931 were admitted with spontaneous onset of labor (control group). Vaginal tablets of PGE(2) were used for cervical ripening in the study group. Mode of delivery, neonatal outcome, indications for cesarean section, and rate of uterine rupture were compared between the groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the study and control groups in mean (+/-S.D.) maternal age (30.9 +/- 4.7 years versus 31.2 +/- 4.8 years, P = 0.6), gestational age at delivery (39.2 +/- 1.8 weeks versus 39.3 +/- 1.6 weeks, P = 0.36), overall rate of cesarean section (36% versus 37.3%, P = 0.8), rates of low 5-min Apgar score less than or equal to7 (3.1 % versus 3.7%, P = 0.67) or cesarean section performed for nonreassuring fetal heart rate (6.1% versus 3.1%, P = 0.1). There were four cases of uterine rupture, all in the control group compared to none in the study group (nonsignificant). Conclusion: The findings suggest that induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section does not increase the risk of cesarean section rate and does not adversely affect immediate neonatal outcome. We cautiously suggest that when there is no absolute indication for repeated cesarean section, induction of labor may be considered. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 176
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis [J].
Ananth, CV ;
Smulian, JC ;
Vintzileos, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (05) :1071-1078
[2]  
Bebbington M., 2000, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V182, pS137
[3]   CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOR INDUCTION AFTER PREVIOUS CESAREAN DELIVERY [J].
CHEZ, RA .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 38 (02) :287-292
[4]  
Crowley P., 1996, J SOGC, V18, P1143, DOI [10.1016/S0849-5831(16)30264-6, DOI 10.1016/S0849-5831(16)30264-6]
[5]   Placenta accreta - Summary of 10 years: A survey of 310 cases [J].
Gielchinsky, Y ;
Rojansky, N ;
Fasouliotis, SJ ;
Ezra, Y .
PLACENTA, 2002, 23 (2-3) :210-214
[6]   The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity [J].
Gilliam, M ;
Rosenberg, D ;
Davis, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (06) :976-980
[7]   Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. [J].
Lydon-Rochelle, M ;
Holt, VL ;
Easterling, TR ;
Martin, DP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01) :3-8
[8]   Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999 [J].
Mozurkewich, EL ;
Hutton, EK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (05) :1187-1197
[9]   Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section [J].
Plaut, MM ;
Schwartz, ML ;
Lubarsky, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (06) :1535-1540
[10]  
Raskin KS, 1999, J REPROD MED, V44, P571