E-service quality: comparing the perceptions of providers and customers

被引:34
作者
Stiakakis, Emmanouil [1 ]
Georgiadis, Christos K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macedonia, Dept Appl Informat, Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
MANAGING SERVICE QUALITY | 2009年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
Services; Customer services quality; Electronic commerce; Business-to-business marketing; MULTIPLE-ITEM SCALE; DIMENSIONS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1108/09604520910971539
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to identify the similarities and differences between the perspectives of providers and customers regarding the important dimensions and attributes of e-service quality (e-SQ). Design/methodology/approach - Ten criteria are proposed for assessment of e-SQ in both business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions. Confirmatory factor analysis confirms the validity of grouping these criteria into five proposed dimensions. The e-SQ dimensions and criteria are then ranked in terms of their importance by a survey of respondents from small and medium-sized enterprises with experience in conducting e-business in Greece. The results are compared with selected surveys of customers' perceptions from the literature. Findings - The results indicate that the providers' perceptions are in agreement with customers' perceptions with regard to e-SQ dimensions, but not with regard to specific criteria (items) within those dimensions. The study also finds that providers have similar perceptions of the importance of the suggested e-SQ criteria in B2B and B2C electronic transactions. Research limitations/implications - The findings should be generalised with care if extrapolated to other socio-cultural settings and specific industries. Practical implications Managers should recognise that there might be differences between their views of e-SQ and those of their customers. Originality/value - This is one of the few studies to have focused on the perceptions of providers in assessing e-SQ.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 430
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, working paper no.00-115
[2]  
Auer C., 2004, International Journal of Electronic Business, V2, P583, DOI 10.1504/IJEB.2004.006127
[3]  
Barnes R.T., 2002, J ELECTRON COMMER RE, V3, P114, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IM.2006.06.001
[4]   Quantitive evaluation of Web site content and structure [J].
Bauer, C ;
Scharl, A .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (01) :31-43
[5]   Measuring the quality of e-banking portals [J].
Bauer, Hans H. ;
Hammerschmidt, Maik ;
Falk, Tomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2005, 23 (02) :153-175
[6]   eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping [J].
Bauer, Hans H. ;
Falk, Tomas ;
Hammerschmidt, Maik .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2006, 59 (07) :866-875
[7]  
BAUER HH, 2000, ECOMMERCE RES FORUM
[8]   E-services: operating strategy - a case study and a method for analyzing operational benefits [J].
Boyer, KK ;
Hallowell, R ;
Roth, AV .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2002, 20 (02) :175-188
[9]  
CHAFFEY D, 2000, MEASURING ONLINE SER
[10]   Measuring service quality in e-retailing [J].
Collier, Joel E. ;
Bienstock, Carol C. .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (03) :260-275