Patient trust and patient safety for low-priority patients: A randomized controlled trial pilot study in the prehospital chain of care

被引:10
作者
Boysen, Gabriella Norberg [1 ,2 ]
Christensson, Lennart [3 ]
Jutengren, Goran [2 ]
Herlitz, Johan [1 ,2 ]
Sundstrom, Birgitta Wireklint [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, PreHospen Ctr Prehosp Res, Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Boras, Fac Caring Sci Work Life & Social Welf, SE-50190 Boras, Sweden
[3] Jonkoping Univ, Dept Nursing, Sch Hlth Sci, Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
Low-priority patients; Patient trust; Patient safety; Appropriate delivery of health care; Ambulance care; Community Health Centre; Emergency Department; AMBULANCE; PROTOCOL; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ienj.2019.06.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Patients who call for an ambulance but only have primary care needs do not always get appropriate care. The starting point in this study is that such patients should be assigned to as basic of care as possible, while maintaining high levels of patient trust and patient safety. Aim: To evaluate patient trust and patient safety among low-priority ambulance patients referred to care at either the Community Health Centre (CHC) or the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: This randomized controlled trial pilot study compared the level of patient trust and patient safety among low-priority ambulance patients who were randomized into two groups: CHC (n = 105) or ED (n = 83). Results: There was a high level of trust in the care received, regardless of whether the patient received care at CHC or ED. Overall 31% fulfilled one or more of the given criteria for potentially jeopardizing patient safety. Conclusion: Patient selection for the trial indicated a potential limit in patient safety. There was a high level of trust in the care received regardless of whether the patient received care. The accuracy of patient selection for the new care model needs to be further improved with the intention to enhance patient safety even further.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Ahl Caroline, 2006, Accid Emerg Nurs, V14, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.002
  • [2] [Anonymous], IRISH J PARAMED
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, J PARAMED PRACT, DOI DOI 10.12968/IPPR.2011.1.2.63
  • [4] Arvidsson E, 2012, SCAND J PRIMARY HLTH, V27, P123
  • [5] Bell Liz, 2009, Br J Nurs, V18, P46
  • [6] Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine
    Berner, Eta S.
    Graber, Mark L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 121 (05) : 2 - 23
  • [7] Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use
    Carret, Maria L. V.
    Fassa, Anaclaudia G.
    Kawachi, Ichiro
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7
  • [8] From Mindless to Mindful Practice - Cognitive Bias and Clinical Decision Making
    Croskerry, Pat
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (26) : 2445 - 2448
  • [9] Factors influencing ambulance nurses' adherence to a national protocol ambulance care: an implementation study in the Netherlands
    Ebben, Remco H. A.
    Vloet, Lilian C. M.
    van Grunsven, Pierre M.
    Breeman, Wim
    Goosselink, Ben
    Lichtveld, Rob A.
    Mintjes-De Groot, Joke A. J.
    van Achterberg, Theo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (03) : 199 - 205
  • [10] Patient safety and patient assessment in pre-hospital care: a study protocol
    Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson
    Nilsson, Lena
    Stromsoe, Anneli
    Axelsson, Christer
    Kangstrom, Anna
    Herlitz, Johan
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 24