Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy

被引:84
作者
Unger, Cecile A. [1 ]
Paraiso, Marie Fidela R. [1 ]
Jelovsek, John E. [1 ]
Barber, Matthew D. [1 ]
Ridgeway, Beri [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Womens Hlth Inst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ctr Urogynecol & Pelv Reconstruct Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy; perioperative adverse events; rectopexy; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; OUTCOMES; COLPOPEXY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.054
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our first objective was to compare peri- and postoperative adverse events between robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) and conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in a cohort of women who underwent these procedures at a tertiary care center. Our second objective was to explore whether hysterectomy and rectopexy at the time of sacrocolpopexy were associated with these adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent either RSC or LSC with or without concomitant hysterectomy and/or rectopexy from 2006-2012. Once patients were identified as either having undergone RSC or LSC, the electronic medical record was queried for demographic, peri-, and postoperative data. RESULTS: Four hundred six women met study inclusion criteria. Mean age and body mass index of all the women were 58 +/- 10 years and 27.9 +/- 4.9 kg/m(2). The women who underwent RSC were older (60 +/- 9 vs 57 +/- 10 years, respectively; P = .009) and more likely to be postmenopausal (90.9% vs 79.1%, respectively; P = .05). RSC cases were associated with a higher intraoperative bladder injury rate (3.3% vs 0.4%, respectively; P = .04), a higher rate of estimated blood loss of >= 500 mL (2.5% vs 0, respectively; P = .01), and reoperation rate for pelvic organ prolapse (4.9% vs 1.1%, respectively; P = .02) compared with LSC. Concomitant rectopexy was associated with a higher risk of transfusion (2.8% vs 0.3%, respectively; P = .04), pelvic/abdominal abscess formation (11.1% vs 0.8%, respectively; P < .001), and osteomyelitis (5.6% vs 0, respectively; P < .001). The mesh erosion rate for all the women was 2.7% and was not statistically different between LSC and RSC and for patients who underwent concomitant hysterectomy and those who did not. CONCLUSION: Peri-and postoperative outcomes after RSC and LSC are favorable, with few adverse outcomes. RSC is associated with a higher rate of bladder injury, estimated blood loss >= 500 mL, and reoperation for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse; otherwise, the rate of adverse events is similar between the 2 modalities. Concomitant rectopexy is associated with a higher rate of postoperative abscess and osteomyelitis complications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy [J].
Awad, Nibal ;
Mustafa, Suzana ;
Amit, Amnon ;
Deutsch, Michael ;
Eldor-Itskovitz, Joseph ;
Lowenstein, Lior .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (06) :1181-1186
[2]   Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation [J].
Benson, JT ;
Lucente, V ;
McClellan, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1418-1421
[3]   Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence [J].
Brubaker, Linda ;
Nygaard, Ingrid ;
Richter, Holly E. ;
Visco, Anthony ;
Weber, Anne M. ;
Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ;
Fine, Paul ;
Ghetti, Chiara ;
Brown, Morton B. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (01) :49-55
[4]  
Chan Cindy M. Y., 2011, Hong Kong Medical Journal, V17, P301
[5]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[6]   A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study [J].
Freeman, R. M. ;
Pantazis, K. ;
Thomson, A. ;
Frappell, J. ;
Bombieri, L. ;
Moran, P. ;
Slack, M. ;
Scott, P. ;
Waterfield, M. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (03) :377-384
[7]   The Current Status of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Review [J].
Ganatra, Anjali M. ;
Rozet, Francois ;
Sanchez-Salas, Rafael ;
Barret, Eric ;
Galiano, Marc ;
Cathelineau, Xavier ;
Vallancien, Guy .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1089-1103
[8]   Robotic Vs Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: 44-Month Pelvic Floor Outcomes [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Parnell, Brent A. ;
Dunivan, Gena C. .
UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (03) :532-536
[9]   Pelvic Floor Function Before and After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: One-Year Outcomes [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Parnell, Brent A. ;
Dunivan, Gena C. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03) :322-327
[10]   Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Germain, A. ;
Thibault, F. ;
Galifet, M. ;
Scherrer, M. -L. ;
Ayav, A. ;
Hubert, J. ;
Brunaud, L. ;
Bresler, L. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (02) :525-529